Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights November 2024 Year 2024 This

The assessee company received share capital and share ...


Tribunal Rules Share Capital Transactions Legitimate; Revenue Fails to Prove Otherwise u/s 68.

November 7, 2024

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

The assessee company received share capital and share application money from 13 share applicants. The Assessing Officer (AO) made an addition u/s 68, alleging that the identity, creditworthiness of the share applicants, and genuineness of the transactions were not proved. The assessee filed voluminous documents to establish the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness. The Tribunal held that the documents speak for themselves, proving the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness beyond doubt, as the share applicant companies had sufficient net worth to make the investments in the NBFC company for better returns. Once the assessee discharged the primary onus, the burden shifted to the Revenue. The AO's general observations of dissatisfaction without examining the correctness of the documents were unjustified. The audited balance sheets showed the share applicants had sufficient net worth. The provisions of Section 56(2)(viib) were not applicable for the year under consideration. The assessee successfully explained the nature and source of the share application money by proving the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness. The assessee discharged the burden of proof, and the Revenue did not dispute the details except making general observations. Hence, no addition u/s 68 was called for.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Addition u/s 68 - share application money received as unaccounted cash credit - identity and creditworthiness of the share subscribers and genuineness of the transaction...

  2. Addition u/s 68 - share capital issued at the premium - unexplained cash credit - Assessee has fully discharged its onus cast under section 68 of the Act and proved the...

  3. Addition u/s 68 - bogus share capital & share premium - The assessee failed to prove that the transactions of share application money is genuine and the creditworthiness...

  4. Addition u/s 68 - genuineness of the transaction - share capital and share premium - identity and creditworthiness of the investors - the genuineness of the transaction...

  5. ITAT ruled in favor of the appellant regarding share capital additions under Section 68. The tribunal found that since cash receipts and corresponding credits occurred...

  6. Non-proving identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of share premium received cannot be treated as unexplained income if sufficient documentary evidence is provided....

  7. The assessee had demonstrated the genuineness of the share transaction resulting in long-term capital gains, which were claimed as exempt u/s 10(38). The Revenue...

  8. Unexplained share capital and premium received by assessee company was its own unaccounted money flowing back in form of premium on share allotment. Assessee filed...

  9. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the addition u/s 68 as the assessee failed to prove the genuineness of LTCG claimed u/s 10(38). The AO found discrepancies in off-market...

  10. The ITAT Mumbai addressed the issue of addition u/s 68 regarding penny stock transactions. The genuineness of share transactions was questioned, with the assessee...

  11. ITAT ruled against treating entire share sale proceeds as undisclosed income under section 68. While penny stock transactions require scrutiny, price volatility alone...

  12. Addition u/s 68 - unexplained share premium and share capital - the assessee has substantially provided materials to prove the genuineness of the share holders apart...

  13. Addition u/s 68 - addition in share capital and share premium, identity and creditworthiness of the share holders, valuation report - Since no cash was involved in...

  14. The ITAT considered an addition made u/s 68 for the sale of shares as an 'unexplained source of investment'. The assessee, a foreign company tax resident of Mauritius,...

  15. Addition u/s 68 - creditworthiness of investor unexplained - the documents submitted to prove the genuineness of transaction are itself from to be malaises created with...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates