Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Indian Laws - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights November 2024 Year 2024 This

The Supreme Court held that at the stage of Section 11 ...


Courts to Verify Arbitration Agreement Existence, Leave Time-Barred Claims Assessment to Arbitral Tribunal.

November 9, 2024

Case Laws     Indian Laws     SC

The Supreme Court held that at the stage of Section 11 application under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the referral courts need only examine whether the arbitration agreement exists, and not delve into the merits of the claims. However, in rare cases where it is manifest that the claims are ex facie time-barred and dead, or there is no subsisting dispute, the courts can decline the reference to arbitration. The Court clarified that the period of limitation for filing a petition seeking appointment of an arbitrator cannot be conflated with the period of limitation applicable to substantive claims under the commercial contract. While the respondents contended that the petitioner's claims were time-barred, the Court left it to the arbitral tribunal to adjudicate upon this issue as a preliminary matter, as the existence of the arbitration agreement was not disputed.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Jurisdiction of the referral court at pre-referral stage - arbitration agreement - If the dispute/issue with respect to the existence and validity of an arbitration...

  2. Arbitration application allowed u/s 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court's role limited to determining existence of arbitration agreement and not...

  3. The High Court addressed the restriction on the petitioner's claim for GST amounts due to the end of the agreement between the respondent and the renter. The court held...

  4. Rejection of applications under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - There being no doubt about non-existence of arbitration agreement in relation...

  5. The High Court exceeded its limited jurisdiction u/s 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by undertaking a detailed examination of the factual matrix and...

  6. Existence of arbitration agreement between the parties - This Court is of the opinion that merely because the proposal forwarded on behalf of the respondents, by letter...

  7. Contempt of Court - willful disobedience - The breach of undertaking amounts to contempt as defined under Section 2 (b) of Contempt of Court Act but a remedy is provided...

  8. Rebate claim – refund claim was time barred - rebate claim was rightly rejected as time barred but the re-credit of duty paid in Cenvat account is not admissible - CGOVT

  9. The issue pertained to the validity of filing a revised return after the prescribed time limit. The High Court set aside the Tribunal's order, stating that after the...

  10. Appointment of a arbitrator - requirement of sufficient stamping of documents - Although we agree that there is a need to constitute a larger Bench to settle the...

  11. The SC held that Indian courts have jurisdiction to appoint arbitrators under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, despite conflicting clauses in...

  12. The Delhi High Court considered the validity of an arbitral award and the jurisdiction of the Facilitation Council u/s 18 of the MSME Act. The key issue was the...

  13. Dishonour of Cheque - Effect of arbitration proceedings - The High Court referred to a Supreme Court judgment which clarified that arbitration proceedings and...

  14. The Court addressed whether a non-signatory party should be referred to arbitration along with the signatory parties. It held that the referral court must prima facie...

  15. Non-Stamping of arbitration agreements - Agreements which are not stamped or are inadequately stamped are inadmissible in evidence under Section 35 of the Stamp Act....

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates