The Court addressed whether a non-signatory party should be ...

Non-signatory party's referral to arbitration depends on evidence of intent to be bound.

Case Laws Indian Laws

September 23, 2024

The Court addressed whether a non-signatory party should be referred to arbitration along with the signatory parties. It held that the referral court must prima facie determine the existence of an arbitration agreement and whether the non-signatory is a party to it. However, the arbitral tribunal is better equipped to conclusively decide if the non-signatory intended to be bound by the arbitration agreement based on evidence and legal doctrines. Factors like mutual intent, relationship with signatories, commonality of subject matter, and performance of the contract indicate the non-signatory's intention to be bound. Considering the complexity, the Court appointed a sole arbitrator to determine if the non-signatory group should be included in the arbitration after examining evidence and applying legal principles outlined in Cox and Kings.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The Court addressed whether a non-signatory party should be ...

Non-signatory party's referral to arbitration depends on evidence of intent to be bound.

Case Laws Indian Laws

September 23, 2024

You may also like:

Arbitration agreement - group company - binding of the agreement on the subsidiary company - A non-signatory can be bound by an arbitration agreement on the basis of the...

Arbitration agreement - Applicability on the party who is not the signatory of the agreement - Scope of Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - The...

Jurisdiction of the referral court at pre-referral stage - arbitration agreement - If the dispute/issue with respect to the existence and validity of an arbitration...

Existence of arbitration agreement between the parties - This Court is of the opinion that merely because the proposal forwarded on behalf of the respondents, by letter...

The High Court exceeded its limited jurisdiction u/s 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by undertaking a detailed examination of the factual matrix and...

CIRP proceedings - Operational Creditors - Rejection of application u/s 9 by the NCLT and NCLAT - When the agreement entered into between the parties carries an...

Validity of the ‘Group of Companies’ doctrine in the jurisprudence of Indian arbitration - whether there can be a reconciliation between the group of companies doctrine...

The doctrine of forum non conveniens was applied to determine the maintainability of a petition u/s 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court held that...

Arbitration Agreement - Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act Act - The MoU has been executed between the appellant and the first respondent. The non-family...

Non-Stamping of arbitration agreements - Agreements which are not stamped or are inadequately stamped are inadmissible in evidence under Section 35 of the Stamp Act....

Forum for Arbitration - Seat of the arbitral proceedings - The closest connection test strongly relied upon by Mr. Himani would only apply if it is unclear that a seat...

The parties expressly chose to have the place of arbitration in New York. This being the case, juridical seat of arbitration was New York. In fact, the appellant...

This is a summary of a court ruling on the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The key points are:...

Referring matter to larger bench - It is not open to the Referral Bench to appreciate the judgment rendered by the earlier Bench as if sitting in appeal to hold that the...

Arbitration clause - that if the contract was superseded by another, the arbitration clause, being a component part of the earlier contract, falls with it - But where...

Quick Updates: