Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was invalid due to procedural ...

Reopening of tax assessment quashed due to procedural lapses - lax verification, lack of application of mind by tax officers.

Case Laws Income Tax

November 14, 2024

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was invalid due to procedural irregularities. The Assessing Officer initiated proceedings without verifying information and the Commissioner of Income Tax granted approval without applying mind. Approval by Commissioner was without recording independent satisfaction, rendering reopening unsustainable. Consequently, notice u/s 148 and subsequent proceedings were quashed. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erroneously passed order regarding Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme despite assessee not applying for immunity, hence order quashed. The Assessing Officer made addition without invoking any provision of law or specifying head of income, violating principles of natural justice by denying assessee opportunity to defend. Supreme Court rulings mandate providing reasonable notice of charges and provisions violated. Absence of such notice vitiated proceedings. Therefore, addition made by authorities was deleted and appeal allowed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was invalid due to procedural ...

Reopening of tax assessment quashed due to procedural lapses - lax verification, lack of application of mind by tax officers.

Case Laws Income Tax

November 14, 2024

You may also like:

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was challenged. The Assessing Officer (AO) had disallowed 20% of total sundry creditors in the regular assessment u/s 143(3). The AO...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - In case incorrect, wrong and non-existing reasons are recorded by the A.O. for reopening of the assessment and A.O. failed to verify...

The Assessing Officer (AO) reopened the assessment solely based on the information from a survey conducted by the Sales Tax Department, without independently examining...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was done solely for the purpose of verification of the source of purchase of property, which is not a valid reason as per settled...

Validity of reopening notice - Absence of the manual/digital signature of the A.O in the copy of the Reopening notice - Elaborating on the term "signed", it was observed...

Mere assertion of "failure to disclose fully and truly all material facts" does not confer jurisdiction for reopening assessment beyond four years. AO must demonstrate...

The High Court quashed the reopening notice issued by the Assessing Officer u/s 148 for reassessment beyond the period of four years. The assessee had filed returns...

Validity of reopening assessment challenged due to non-disposal of objections raised by assessee against reassessment. Deduction u/s 24(a) proposed to be disallowed....

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was invalid as there was no failure by the assessee to disclose material facts. The assessment was reopened solely based on information...

Reopening of assessment – Approval not granted by Joint Commissioner, instead taken from Commissioner of Income- tax – Reopening of assessment invalid therefore quashed - AT

CENVAT credit - procedural lapses - whether credit of Cenvat taken on the basis of ISD Invoices issued by the Head Office of the appellant units is deniable for curable...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Reopening based on audit objections - reasons to believe - High Court observed that, reopening an assessment beyond four years requires...

Money Laundering - Seeking quashing and setting aside of the Look Out Circular (LOC) - The Bombay High Court quashed the LOC issued by the ED against the petitioner,...

Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - AO has not even made minimum exercise for ascertaining the unsecured loans accepted during the year, under consideration...

Validity of reopening of assessment - It is well settled Law that validity of the reassessment proceedings is to be judged with reference to the reasons recorded for...

Quick Updates: