Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights November 2024 Year 2024 This

Penalty imposed u/s 270A(9) for underreporting and misreporting ...


Tribunal Overturns 200% Penalty for Income Misreporting Due to Vague Notice Lacking Clear Charge Specification.

November 18, 2024

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Penalty imposed u/s 270A(9) for underreporting and misreporting of income was challenged due to non-specification of clear charge. The Tribunal held that underreporting and misreporting have different connotations and consequences. In the notices issued u/s 274 read with Section 270A, no specific charge or limb was specified. The Tribunal observed that the Delhi High Court in Schneider Electric South East Asia (HQ) had dealt with a case where the ingredients of sub-section 9 of Section 270A were not specified while imposing the penalty, ultimately affirming the deletion of the penalty. In the present case, the Assessing Officer initiated penalty proceedings u/s 270A without mentioning any sub-clause or specifying the limb for levying the proposed penalty. The notice was vague and did not mention "misreporting of income," whereas the penalty was ultimately levied for both underreporting and misreporting at 200% u/s 270A(9), for which no show cause notice was issued. The Tribunal decided in favor of the assessee.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The Appellate Tribunal considered two issues: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) and u/s 270A. For the first, the Tribunal found the penalty notice defective as it did not specify...

  2. Penalty proceedings u/s 270A - Applicable rate of penalty - The Appellate Tribunal noted that while the penalty notice cited under-reporting of income, the AO imposed...

  3. Penalty u/s 270A - allegation of misreporting as per section 270A(9) - Penalty @200% in respect of excess claim of depreciation - The tribunal found that the...

  4. ITAT held that no specific charge was framed against the assessee in the show-cause notice issued u/s 274 read with Section 270A for misreporting of income. While the...

  5. Penalty u/s 270A and 271AAB - Defective notice u/s 274 - under reporting of income - search and seizure operation - The Tribunal found that the penalty notices under...

  6. AO imposed penalty under s.270A for unsubstantiated business expenses including advertising, development, land, and excavation charges, which were disallowed from...

  7. Insertion of new section 270A - Penalty for underreporting and misreporting of income. - failure to record any receipt in books of account having a bearing on total...

  8. Penalty levied u/s 270A - misreporting of income - Since AO failed to bring the addition/disallowance he made in quantum assessment, under the ken of (a) to (f) of the...

  9. Insertion of new section 270A - Penalty for underreporting and misreporting of income. - claim of expenditure not substantiated by any evidence will form misreporting of...

  10. The Delhi High Court analyzed the levy of penalty u/s 270A for under-reporting and misreporting of income. The court emphasized that under-reporting and misreporting are...

  11. The Appellate Tribunal considered the validity of a penalty notice u/s 271(1)(c) and u/s 274 regarding unexplained differences in trading sales and purchase costs. The...

  12. Penalty levied u/s 270A - misreporting of income un/s 270A(8) and 270A(9) or not - Assessee filed the ITR after search conducted on third party but before the due date...

  13. Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) for under reporting income - defective notice - The Tribunal agrees with the appellant's argument, emphasizing that the AO did not apply his mind...

  14. This case pertains to the imposition of penalty u/s 270AA for under-reporting of income due to misreporting. The assessee had availed interest-bearing loans and advanced...

  15. The Appellate Tribunal considered the levy of penalty u/s 270A. The Assessing Officer (AO) imposed the penalty u/s 270A(9)(a) for misrepresentation of facts and...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates