The Appellate Tribunal considered the validity of final ...

Final assessment orders for AY 2017-18 & 2018-19 passed beyond time limit. Orders quashed.

Case Laws Income Tax

June 22, 2024

The Appellate Tribunal considered the validity of final assessment orders passed beyond the limit set by section 144C(13). It was held that the Assessing Officer (AO) must issue the final assessment order within one month of receiving directions from the DRP. In the case of AY 2017-18, the AO passed the final assessment order on 02.01.2023, which was after the prescribed time limit, making it barred by limitation. Similarly, for AY 2018-19, the AO's order on 30.12.2022 was also beyond the limit. Consequently, both orders were quashed as they violated section 144C(13), and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The Appellate Tribunal considered the validity of final ...

Final assessment orders for AY 2017-18 & 2018-19 passed beyond time limit. Orders quashed.

Case Laws Income Tax

June 22, 2024

You may also like:

The Tribunal held that the assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer was barred by limitation and quashed it. As per Section 144C(13) read with Section 143(3),...

The case pertains to the jurisdiction of impugned orders under the U.P.G.S.T. Act, 2017, and the time limitation u/s 73 and Section 44 of the Act. The key points are:...

Assessment u/s 153A - In the case on hand, the search was conducted on 10.08.2017 and the relevant six assessment years immediately preceding the assessment year...

The court found that the factual position was not in dispute. The authority made assessments for the financial years 2017-18 and 2018-19 based on an intelligence report....

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - validity of order u/s 148A(d) - Here is the case, where, by total non application of mind to the fact that in respect of subsequent...

SEZ units - method of computation of an amount of deduction u/s 10AA - Budget 2017-18 w.e.f. AY 2018-19

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was challenged due to lack of material relating to alleged wrongful IGST refunds for assessment year 2020-21. Disallowable expenditure...

Validity of order u/s 92CA - time limit for passing of the TPO order - period of limitation - despite the fact that the reference made to the Ld. TPO is valid, in...

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for Scrutiny of GST returns for FY 2017-18 and 2018-19

Time limit to pass assessment u/s. 92CA(3) - Transfer pricing adjustments - After thorough consideration of the statutory provisions and legal arguments presented by...

Limitation for passing a assessment order - Consequential order passed by the assessing authority beyond the time limit specified u/s 153 (2A) - The High Court examined...

The case pertains to the treatment of income received from an arbitral award in the assessment year. The AO passed an assessment order u/s 143(3) after the case was...

Petitioners challenged adjudication order passed u/s 73(9) of CGST/WBGST Act, 2017. Court noted Rs. 3,96,08,142/- was reversible as petitioners availed ITC by filing...

Assessee's contention upheld that for AY 2019-20, profit is required to be set off against business loss of AY 2018-19 and remaining profit against brought forward...

Seeks to waive filing of FORM ITC-04 for F.Y. 2017-18 & 2018-19 - details of all the challans in respect of goods dispatched to a job worker

Quick Updates: