The case pertains to the classification of goods, specifically ...

Product Classification of Biovita Remanded for Review Under Larger Bench Guidelines; Appeals Allowed for Reconsideration.

November 22, 2024

Case Laws Central Excise AT

The case pertains to the classification of goods, specifically Biovita, under the appropriate Central Excise Tariff heading. The show cause notice relied on a CBEC Circular prescribing that micronutrients cannot be classified under Chapter 31 as 'fertilizer' and the appellants' previous classification of the goods under different headings. However, subsequent to the impugned order, the classification issue between Chapters 31 and 38 was referred to a Larger Bench in the case of PI Industries, the principal manufacturer. As the products in the instant case are similar in nature, the principles laid down by the Larger Bench in PI Industries' case would apply. Consequently, the impugned order is set aside, and the matter is remanded to the original adjudicating authority for a fresh decision in light of the Larger Bench's observations in PI Industries' case. The appeal is allowed by way of remand.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The case pertains to the classification of goods, specifically ...

Product Classification of Biovita Remanded for Review Under Larger Bench Guidelines; Appeals Allowed for Reconsideration.

November 22, 2024

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Maintainability of appeal before tribunal - Seizure of goods - Section 110(A) - Two member bench disagrees with the decision of larger bench - matter referred to the...

Reference the matter to the larger bench of 3 members by the Single Member Bench - Even if the learned Member hearing this appeal found it difficult to accept the view...

CESTAT determined Natural Beta Carotene Powder's classification under Customs Tariff Act, 1975. While appellant sought classification under TI 3203 00 20 (industrial...

Appointment of a arbitrator - requirement of sufficient stamping of documents - Although we agree that there is a need to constitute a larger Bench to settle the...

Judgment of the Larger Bench of Tribunal on Aluminum dross and skimming – reg. - Order-Instruction

The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the appellant and set aside the impugned order disallowing CENVAT credit taken on input services used in BTS (Base Transceiver...

Power of commissioner (appeals) to remand back the case - There are no piece of evidence to take a contrary view to the finding of the first appellate authority as to...

Review of the policy on Foreign Direct Investment in the Civil Aviation sector - FDI GUIDELINES

Referring matter to larger bench - It is not open to the Referral Bench to appreciate the judgment rendered by the earlier Bench as if sitting in appeal to hold that the...

Power of Tribunal to review the judgment versus Power to re-call - Larger Bench (5 Members) decision - The judgments of the Hon’ble Supreme Court clearly lays down that...

Validity of Show Cause Notice (SCN) - service tax is leviable on royalty paid on mining operations or not - issue is pending before the larger bench of the Supreme Court...

The Chief Justice, in his administrative capacity, cannot constitute a Larger Bench for the purpose of deciding a pure question of law simply because the Chief Justice...

The Larger Bench held that an appeal against an order passed u/s 142(6) of the CGST Act, 2017 is maintainable before the CESTAT. The Tribunal, citing a precedent...

Classification of Lost Circulation Control Additives (LCCA) - product LCCA is a product derived from cellulosic fibre the classification of the said product under...

Rectification of mistake u/s 154 - deduction u/s 80P - appeal of assessee was allowed following order of High Court, subsequently, that decision was reversed by the...

Quick Updates: