Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights December 2024 Year 2024 This

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) adjudicated on various ...


ITAT Rules on Transfer Pricing: Upholds TPO's Unit Treatment, Remands Tested Parties Issue, Adjusts Brand Fees and Comparables.

December 2, 2024

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) adjudicated on various transfer pricing issues concerning an assessee. Regarding segmentation of business activities, the ITAT upheld the Transfer Pricing Officer's (TPO) approach of treating the UDS and CM segments as a composite unit for determining the arm's length price, dismissing the assessee's claim of separate segments. However, on the issue of rejecting overseas associated enterprises as tested parties, the ITAT remanded the matter to the TPO for re-adjudication after obtaining necessary details and providing due opportunity to the assessee. The ITAT deleted the TPO's upward adjustment for brand development fees, relying on coordinate bench rulings that such expenditures are not international transactions. For the business processing service segment, the ITAT excluded Infosys Technologies Ltd. and HSCC India Ltd. from the list of comparables and restored the matter to the TPO for recalculation of adjustments. Regarding advances received for extended warranties, the ITAT held that such amounts become taxable income only in the year of maturity of the warranty contracts, not the year of sale, to avoid double taxation. The ITAT also remitted the issue of disallowance of reversed expense provisions to the Assessing Officer for re-adjudication after obtaining necessary details from the assessee.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Transfer pricing officer (TPO) erred by considering non-associated enterprise (non-AE) revenue and costs while computing transfer pricing (TP) adjustment, contrary to...

  2. The ITAT ruled against the assessee regarding applicability of section 92BA in a power supply transaction case. The Tribunal held that claiming deduction u/s 80IA is not...

  3. The ITAT upheld the order of the CIT(A) regarding the Transfer Pricing (TP) adjustment. The Tribunal concurred with the CIT(A)'s decision to exclude two companies with...

  4. The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal for statistical purposes and remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer/Transfer Pricing Officer for fresh adjudication....

  5. The High Court upheld the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which had approved the Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method adopted by the assessee for...

  6. The ITAT held that the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) should consider comparables dealing in electronic products only, supported by a technical expert's certificate,...

  7. The ITAT provided the following rulings: Regarding TP adjustment for comparable selection and treatment of IT support services as ITeS, the issue requires examination by...

  8. TP Adjustment - Rejection of Associated Enterprises as the tested party - foreign Associated Enterprises satisfied all the criteria for being taken as a tested party....

  9. The case pertains to the levy of penalty u/s 271G for failure to furnish documents and information u/ss 92CA/92D. The key points are: The Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO)...

  10. The Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) considered a case involving Transfer Pricing (TP) Adjustment where the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) determined the Arm's Length Price...

  11. ITAT addressed multiple transfer pricing issues in an international business case. TPO was directed to reassess arm's-length pricing for trading segment transactions,...

  12. The ITAT ruled in favor of the appellant regarding transfer pricing of electricity from its captive power plants to its cement unit. The Tribunal rejected the TPO's...

  13. HC determined the ITAT's decision to remand the matter to CIT(A) was improper when the issue was purely legal under Rule 27. Given ITAT had acknowledged the legal nature...

  14. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that in determining the arm's length price for transfer pricing adjustments, three companies (MOIAPL, LCAPL, and MOEPAPL)...

  15. Transfer of CENVAT Credit to lessee unit - Rule 10 of CCR 2004 - On going through the entire agreement, it is clear that there is consensus ad idem to transfer the...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates