The High Court dismissed the petition on the ground of ...

Taxpayer's plea dismissed; instructed to appeal against assessment order to Appellate Authority.

December 9, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

The High Court dismissed the petition on the ground of availability of an alternative statutory remedy of appeal against the assessment order. The petitioner challenged the assessment order citing limitation and violation of principles of natural justice. However, the Court held that whether the extended period of limitation applies and principles of natural justice were violated are mixed questions of fact and law best examined by the Appellate Authority. No serious jurisdictional error warranting interference by the High Court was established. The alleged procedural improprieties can be adequately addressed by the Appellate Authority. Consequently, the Court relegated the petitioner to avail the statutory alternative remedy.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The High Court dismissed the petition on the ground of ...

Taxpayer's plea dismissed; instructed to appeal against assessment order to Appellate Authority.

December 9, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

The taxpayer, an IT/support services provider, received reimbursements from its associated enterprises (AEs) for the cost of providing such services. The tax authorities...

Tax authority rejected rectification application filed by taxpayer for zero-rated supply citing violation of principles of natural justice. Court examined impugned...

Assessment u/s 153A /153C - non-filing the return of income as he was illiterate and not aware of the consequences of non-filing. - plea of the appellant may look...

ITAT dismissed taxpayer's appeal due to procedural deficiencies. Appeal involved 125-day delay without any condonation application being filed. Taxpayer failed to appear...

The ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal, holding that penalty under s.271G for failure to furnish transfer pricing documentation cannot be levied against the German resident...

ITAT affirmed CIT(A)'s directive to grant TDS credit per Form 26AS despite taxpayer's initial failure to claim full credit in tax return due to software technical issues....

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of alleged bogus long-term capital gain u/s 10(38) concerning a transaction involving shares of a company flagged as a penny...

HC held that erroneous attachment of another taxpayer's information to section 148 notice due to inadvertence does not invalidate reassessment proceedings. However, the...

The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, considered an addition u/s 69 concerning a difference in agreed and actual deal value, attributed to unexplained source of stamp duty...

This case deals with the validity of a declaration under the Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme (VCES) for service tax dues. The taxpayer was issued a show cause...

Refund of CGST & SGST wrongly paid - Interpretation of the term “subsequently held” - the term “subsequently held” in section 77 of CGST Act, 2017 or under section 19 of...

Validity of Survey proceedings u/s 133A conducted in absence of assessee - Manner of conducting survey u/s 133A - There was a time gap of more than 3 ½ years between the...

Levy of penalty - In the present case, the course adopted by the appeal authority leaves a lot to be desired. The appeal authority appears to have only considered and...

Exemption from GST - pure services or supply of goods to the Notified Area Authority, Vapi - Notified Area Authority, Vapi is a “local authority” or “governmental...

Validity of impugned order u/s 73 of the CGST Act - The case before the Calcutta High Court involved a challenge to an order issued under the CGST Act, wherein the...

Quick Updates: