The High Court quashed the penalty order u/s 271(1)(c) passed by ...

Penalty order quashed for lack of hearing opportunity; remanded for fresh order after granting hearing.

December 11, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax HC

The High Court quashed the penalty order u/s 271(1)(c) passed by the National Faceless Assessment Centre against the petitioner without providing an opportunity of hearing. The matter was remanded back to pass a fresh penalty order after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner in accordance with law, as the Tribunal had already granted substantial relief to the petitioner on merits in the appeals filed by both parties.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The High Court quashed the penalty order u/s 271(1)(c) passed by ...

Penalty order quashed for lack of hearing opportunity; remanded for fresh order after granting hearing.

December 11, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Petitioner failed to authorize representative for GST matters after registration under GST regime, resulting in show cause notice being served on auditor without...

The High Court quashed refund rejection orders for lack of opportunity for personal hearing as mandated by Rule 92(3) of CGST Rules, 2017, violating principles of...

The case pertains to a violation of the principles of natural justice, wherein the petitioner's right to an opportunity for personal hearing, as provided under the law,...

The HC set aside both the assessment order and rectification order, remanding the matter to the assessing authority for fresh consideration. The Court found that the...

Recovery notices and bank attachment orders - No opportunity of being heard - discrepancies between the GSTR 3B return and the GSTR 2B return - The High Court observed...

The court held that the impugned order was passed in violation of principles of natural justice as no opportunity of personal hearing was provided to the petitioner...

Violation of principles of natural justice by the Adjudicating Officer/Authority in denying opportunity of hearing to appellant A.P. Parekh, who was not a member of the...

The petition raised issues regarding the maintainability of the appeal u/s 107 of the UPGST Act, 2017, violation of Section 75(4) of the Act, and denial of opportunity...

Determination of tax u/s 73(9) of the CGST/SGST Act - petitioner submits that the order is passed merely on the representation of the petitioner without giving any...

Recovery notice - Validity of assessment orders - The High court observed that while personal hearings were offered to the petitioner, it was evident that the petitioner...

Refund of double tax paid by petitioner along with interest for November and December 2020 sought. Non-filing of GSTR-3B from July to December 2020. Petitioner to claim...

The High Court quashed the order of cancellation of registration passed by the respondent authorities without providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner,...

Validity of order for levy of penalty - Principles of natural justice - The provision, that is, Section 75(4) of the Act, has mandated that, only an opportunity of...

Effective opportunity - Courts have consistently interpreted the phrase 'effective opportunity' to mean and include an opportunity of personal hearing as well. In this...

Principles of natural justice violated as petitioner denied opportunity of hearing before passing adverse order. Coordinate bench ruling in BHARAT MINT case affirmed -...

Quick Updates: