The ITAT held that the order passed by the Commissioner of ...

Tax authority's order u/s 263 quashed due to improper notice service & time limitation breach.

December 12, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

The ITAT held that the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(E)] u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act was quashed. The notice issued u/s 263 was not validly served on the assessee, either through registered post or email, before the hearing date. The notices were served only after the hearing date, violating the principles of natural justice. Additionally, the CIT(E)'s order was passed after the two-year limitation period prescribed u/s 263(2) had expired. Relying on the judgments of M L Chains and Tulsi Tracom (P) Ltd., the ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, quashing the CIT(E)'s order due to invalid service of notice and the expiry of the limitation period.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The ITAT held that the order passed by the Commissioner of ...

Tax authority's order u/s 263 quashed due to improper notice service & time limitation breach.

December 12, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Service of garnishee notice u/s 87 - The petitioner has not disputed the quantum of service tax dues quantified in the garnishee notices. Petitioner has only highlighted...

Assessment order quashed due to breach of principles of natural justice. Standard Operating Procedure mandates seven days' response time to show cause notice, but...

Validity of SCN - delivery of notices beyond the time limitation - the notice was served on them by hand on 03.04.2001. In such circumstances, the service of notice...

Key issues regarding invocation of time limitation for raising demand, levy of penalty, exemption from service tax for bundled services related to the game of cricket,...

Validity of assessment - Non service of notice u/s 143(2) - unless there is service of notice in accordance with provision under Section 282 of the Act separately...

Non-payment of service tax on management consultancy services, royalty services, intellectual property right services, business auxiliary services, and banking and...

Dispute regarding non-payment/short payment of service tax, tax demand and interest u/ss 73(2) and 75, penalties u/ss 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, and extended...

The Tribunal held that the amount collected under Interest Free Maintenance Security and Annual Maintenance Charges was refundable and not for providing services, hence...

Exemption from service tax - Legal services - Notary services - The court affirms that legal services provided by individual advocates or firms of advocates are exempt...

The High Court quashed the impugned show cause notice for service tax demand exceeding Rs. 50,00,000/- due to the department's failure to conduct mandatory pre-notice...

Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

The High Court held that the show cause notices issued by the respondent u/s 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017, were flawed due to the improper...

Demand of Service Tax - Photography services - Extended period of Limitation - If the assessee was clearly aware that they had to pay service tax, they could have billed...

Levy of service tax - Life Insurance Service - Renting of Immovable Property Service or not - On the taxability of life insurance service, the Tribunal determined that...

Non-service of mandatory notice u/s 143(2) renders assessment proceedings void ab initio. Revenue failed to prove sending of notice by ordinary post/registered post or...

Quick Updates: