Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights December 2024 Year 2024 This

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dismissed the Revenue's ...


Tribunal upholds genuineness of share capital based on documentary evidence, criticizes tax officer's denial of cross-examination.

December 16, 2024

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dismissed the Revenue's appeal against the assessee company. The assessee had furnished all relevant documents and evidence to prove the genuineness of the share application money received, including PAN details, Memorandum of Association, Articles of Association, Audit Reports, Balance Sheets, Bank statements, share application forms, Board Resolutions, and confirmations from the investor companies. The transactions were through proper banking channels and reflected in the books of accounts. The Assessing Officer (AO) made an addition u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act treating the share capital as unexplained cash credits, solely based on statements recorded in some other case, without providing an opportunity for cross-examination to the assessee. The ITAT held that the AO had denied natural justice by not granting an opportunity for cross-examination and had made the addition without assigning valid reasons or bringing any contrary evidence on record to negate the documentary evidence furnished by the assessee. The ITAT ruled that the impugned addition was unjustified.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Addition u/s 68 - share application money received as unaccounted cash credit - identity and creditworthiness of the share subscribers and genuineness of the transaction...

  2. Non-proving identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of share premium received cannot be treated as unexplained income if sufficient documentary evidence is provided....

  3. Three key issues: validity of reopening assessment, treatment of short-term capital gain on sale of factory building, and disallowance of short-term capital loss on...

  4. The assessee successfully discharged the onus u/s 68 regarding share capital introduced by the company director, a major shareholder, proving identity, creditworthiness,...

  5. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the addition u/s 68 as the assessee failed to establish the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of transactions with Shri Singla...

  6. Addition u/s 68 - shares of the assessee companies issued at huge premiums - The Calcutta High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, rejecting the appeal filed by the...

  7. Addition u/s 68 as accommodation entries - long term capital gain on sale of shares as sham/bogus transaction - Mere suspicion cannot be a ground for treating the...

  8. This case pertains to an alleged offense under FEMA involving bogus purported exports with inflated invoices to obtain export benefits, where the goods never reached the...

  9. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the addition u/s 68 as the assessee failed to prove the genuineness of LTCG claimed u/s 10(38). The AO found discrepancies in off-market...

  10. Appellant booked artificial short-term capital loss by purchasing shares from group entities at exorbitant rates and selling same shares to other group entities at lower...

  11. The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of alleged bogus long-term capital gain u/s 10(38) concerning a transaction involving shares of a company flagged as a penny...

  12. Additions on account of Bogus unsecured loans and bogus share capital money - Revenue argued that the unsecured loan from entities controlled by a hawala operator should...

  13. The case involves the interpretation of u/s 55(2)(b)(i) and u/s 55(2)(aa)(B)(iiia) of the Income Tax Act regarding the cost of acquisition of bonus shares. The Tribunal...

  14. The Assessing Officer (AO) failed to conduct relevant inquiries regarding the shares held as penny stocks by the assessee in GCM Securities Ltd. The Principal...

  15. The case pertains to an addition made u/s 69 for unexplained investment in agricultural land at Ratlam. The issue revolved around whether the addition was based on...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates