UTS-USA provided support services to Reliance Infocom Ltd. ...

Reliance paid service tax on services from US firm, wrongful demand on Indian subsidiary quashed.

December 20, 2024

Case Laws Service Tax AT

UTS-USA provided support services to Reliance Infocom Ltd. located in taxable territory. Reliance Infocom was liable to pay service tax under reverse charge mechanism on the amount paid to UTS-USA during the disputed period, which it discharged. UTS-India, a subsidiary of UTS-USA, was wrongly alleged as the service provider. The demand against UTS-India was set aside by CESTAT as the show cause notice was issued based on wrong presumption and invoking extended period of limitation was incorrect since Reliance Infocom had already paid the service tax. The appeal by UTS-India was allowed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

UTS-USA provided support services to Reliance Infocom Ltd. ...

Reliance paid service tax on services from US firm, wrongful demand on Indian subsidiary quashed.

December 20, 2024

Case Laws Service Tax AT

You may also like:

When a service provider has already paid 100% service tax on manpower supply and security services, demanding the same service tax from the service recipient, who is...

Service tax demand on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services rendered on reverse charge basis set aside as appellant did not collect service tax from service recipient....

Liability to pay service tax for services provided to a foreign entity. The appellant argued that their turnover within the domestic market was below the threshold...

Once a service is subjected to service tax, the same service cannot be taxed again, as it would amount to double taxation, which is impermissible. In this case, even...

Eligibility to make adjustment of excess service tax paid against future service tax liability - Claim of Excess service tax paid due to issuance of revised invoice -...

Reverse charge mechanism (RCM) - Liability of recipient of service to pay service tax - deemed services - The Appellants have received goods from entities located...

Dispute regarding non-payment/short payment of service tax, tax demand and interest u/ss 73(2) and 75, penalties u/ss 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, and extended...

Service tax liability cannot be imposed twice on the same transaction. The appellant, as a service recipient, was required to pay 75% of the service tax under the...

CENVAT Credit - input services - Irrespective of the person whether it is service recipient or service provider is liable to pay the service tax but so long the service...

Demand of differential service tax - Provider of GTA service - Whether the recipient of services were liable to pay ST on reverse charge basis (RCM) - all the service...

Wrongful availment of CENVAT Credit or not - inclusive of service tax contract - appellant shall be entitled to take Cenvat Credit on the amount of service tax paid by...

Legal Services / Services of an Advocate - Recovery of Service Tax alongwith interest and penalty - The High Court observed that, as set out in the Notification, the...

Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

Demand of service tax from Cooperative Society - principle of mutuality - Consultancy service - no demand - HC

Demand of service tax on partners services to partnership firm - separate identity - mutuality of services - there cannot be a service provider – service recipient...

Quick Updates: