The HC held that the petitioner's request for indulgence need ...

Opportunity to respond to tax discrepancies, no indulgence: High Court clarifies procedural stance.

January 2, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

The HC held that the petitioner's request for indulgence need not be granted as the communication dated 12.11.2024 merely afforded an opportunity of hearing after the respondents notified discrepancies. The petitioner can respond to the discrepancies, including contentions u/s 67(1) of the KGST Act raised in the writ petition.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The HC held that the petitioner's request for indulgence need ...

Opportunity to respond to tax discrepancies, no indulgence: High Court clarifies procedural stance.

January 2, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

Validity Of Show cause notice - The case pertains to a dealer of woven fabrics and readymade garments challenging a tax demand order due to allegedly insufficient...

The High Court addressed a challenge to assessment orders where the petitioner lacked a reasonable opportunity to contest tax demands due to discrepancies in returns....

Eligibility for Input Tax Credit - Failure to report outward supply - The objection of the petitioner is that most of these items do not fall within the reverse charge...

Violation of principles of natural justice - petitioner was not provided with an adequate opportunity to defend SCN - The Delhi High Court ruled in favor of the...

HC set aside the impugned order dated 26.06.2024 concerning GST tax discrepancies. Despite petitioner having already remitted approximately 90% of disputed taxes, court...

The court held that the reversal of Input Tax Credit (ITC) by the department due to discrepancy between GSTR 3B and auto-populated GSTR 2A violated principles of natural...

Recovery notices and bank attachment orders - No opportunity of being heard - discrepancies between the GSTR 3B return and the GSTR 2B return - The High Court observed...

In a High Court case, the petitioner challenged an order due to inability to respond to show cause notice or participate in proceedings because of cancer diagnosis....

Petitioner failed to authorize representative for GST matters after registration under GST regime, resulting in show cause notice being served on auditor without...

ITAT determined that Section 249(4)(b) was inapplicable due to specific procedural circumstances. The tribunal found the statutory requirements for advance tax payment...

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal u/s 249(4)(b) due to non-payment of advance tax. The assessee did not respond to the notice u/s 142(1) to clarify tax payment....

Evasion of tax - mismatch in the e-way bill and the branch transfer invoice - levy of penalty and tax on the petitioner - The High Court observed that, even if there was...

Section 90 of the Income Tax Act allows relief from double taxation by granting foreign tax credits (FTCs) on foreign income taxed in both India and the other country....

Levy of penalty u/s 129(5) of GST Act for discrepancy between PIN code of petitioner in Tax Invoices and E-Way Bill. Court held minor discrepancy in PIN code in GST...

HC set aside assessment orders due to procedural deficiencies in tax evaluation. Authority failed to consider complete financial details, particularly regarding tax...

Quick Updates: