The ITAT held that the assessment for AY 2008-09 initiated u/s ...

Limitation Period Breached, But Share Capital Addition Upheld u/s 153A.

January 20, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

The ITAT held that the assessment for AY 2008-09 initiated u/s 153A was beyond the 10-year limitation period prescribed, rendering the assessment order invalid. However, regarding the addition of share capital and share premium u/s 153A, the ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s finding of incriminating material, validating the assessment order, relying on the Goldstone Cements Ltd. case. The appeals were partly allowed and partly dismissed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The ITAT held that the assessment for AY 2008-09 initiated u/s ...

Limitation Period Breached, But Share Capital Addition Upheld u/s 153A.

January 20, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Addition u/s 68 - share application money received as unaccounted cash credit - identity and creditworthiness of the share subscribers and genuineness of the transaction...

Addition u/s 68 - unexplained amounts received towards Share Capital money - entry operators - HC

Assessment u/s 153A - Addition u/s 68 - Unexplained receipt of share application/share capital - After a detailed and objective scrutiny of factual & legal position, the...

Addition u/s 68 - unexplained cash credits of share capital and security premium received - the assessee has routed its unaccounted income in the books of account in the...

Addition u/s 68 - bogus share application/allotment money - The Court noted the factual examination done by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) regarding the share...

Addition u/s 68 - addition in share capital and share premium, identity and creditworthiness of the share holders, valuation report - Since no cash was involved in...

Addition u/s 68 - unexplained share premium and share capital - the assessee has substantially provided materials to prove the genuineness of the share holders apart...

Assumption of jurisdiction u/s 153A was challenged due to unexplained credit u/s 68. Share capital, being a liability, cannot be treated as an asset to invoke...

Addition u/s 68 - unexplained share capital - Even though there were circumstances leading to suspicion, yet having taken an action u/s.132 and enquiries made in the...

Addition u/s 68 - share capital and share premium - any addition which deserved to be made should have been made in the hands of the share applicants who have shown...

Key legal issues and the Tribunal's holdings: Agricultural land sold by assessee situated beyond municipal limits cannot be treated as capital asset u/s 2(14). Addition...

Initiation of CIRP - existence of default and debt - time limitation - Section 22 of the Limitation Act, 1963 relates to ‘breaches and torts’, for the purpose of...

Addition u/s 68 - share capital and share premium - allegation regarding identity and creditworthiness - non appearance of director - addition cannot be sustained merely...

Addition u/s 68 - unexplained share application money - genuineness and creditworthiness of the share capital subscription challenged - ITAT deleted addition - The Delhi...

Addition u/s 68 - AO observed that unexplained money of the assessee brought into its business in the guise of share capital/share premium - For the cogent reasons...

Quick Updates: