Petitioner, a central public sector undertaking, challenged ...

Central PSU's appeal rejected on delay grounds, HC condones delay citing lack of knowledge.

January 20, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

Petitioner, a central public sector undertaking, challenged rejection of its appeal by appellate authority solely on grounds of delay without considering merits. HC quashed appellate order as perverse for mechanically dismissing condonation application without adequately considering petitioner's lack of knowledge about impugned order's issuance. Relying on precedent, HC condoned delay, exercising power u/s 107(4) of the Act, rendering remand to appellate authority unnecessary. Petition disposed of.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Petitioner, a central public sector undertaking, challenged ...

Central PSU's appeal rejected on delay grounds, HC condones delay citing lack of knowledge.

January 20, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

The HC condoned the delay of 799 days by the petitioner in filing Form 9A u/s 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act. Despite the delay being bona fide, the Assessing Officer...

Condonation of delay - Inordinate delay of 1085 days - Power of Commissioner to condone delay beyond condonable period - delay which is beyond the statutory period of...

The HC dismissed a petition challenging the Appellate Authority's refusal to condone a 95-day delay in filing a GST appeal. Under Section 107(1) of GST law, appeals must...

Condonation of delay in filing petition - sufficient ground to condone the delay or not - Grant of default bail - The delay in filing the revision appears to be...

HC allowed petition challenging appellate order under Section 107 of 2017 Act, finding that Appellate Authority failed to judiciously exercise discretionary power...

Condonation of delay in filling appeal before ITAT - delay of 384 days - The assessee's delay in filing appeals, ranging from 383 to 384 days, was not condoned due to...

SC ruled on procedural grounds regarding delay condonation in appeals. The Court held that when the HC determined delay should have been condoned under normal...

Condonation of delay – Ignorance of law is not an excuse - delay not condoned - AT

The Supreme Court considered the Condonation of Delay in filing an appeal for compensation enhancement, analyzing the applicability of Limitation Act provisions. The...

ITAT ought to have condoned 53 days' delay in preferring appeal as appellant explained delay occurred due to wrong advice of counsel to reapply for registration u/s 12A,...

Levy of fee/interest u/s 234E of the Act by the CPC, Bangalore - CIT(A) was of the opinion that the delay was not to be condoned - the delay ought to have been condoned....

Condonation of delay - inordinate delay of 508 days - “sufficient cause” - In case the delay is not condoned, it would amount to legalise an illegal and unconstitutional...

Condonation of delay of 1434 days - Section 35B(3) of CEA - delay due to illness of concern persons and misplacement of paper due to loss of memory - sub-section (5)...

The HC held that it lacks power to condone delay in filing appeals beyond 120 days stipulated u/s 74(1) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land...

Penalty imposed u/s 114(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 for alleged abetment of illegal export by arranging lorries. Lack of admissible evidence showing knowledge of goods...

Quick Updates: