NCLAT dismissed appeals seeking compensation for delayed ...

Homebuyers' compensation claims for EWS flat delays rejected as prior consent bars challenge under Competition Act

February 5, 2025

Case Laws Law of Competition AT

NCLAT dismissed appeals seeking compensation for delayed possession and increased costs of EWS flats. Appellants claimed Rs. 42,42,000/- each, including rental damages, mental agony, interest on deposits, and litigation expenses. The tribunal held that compensation under Section 42A and 53N(1) of Competition Act is payable only for violation of CCI orders, which was not established. Despite CCI finding respondent's abuse of dominant position in the relevant geographic market, appellants' prior consent to cost enhancement barred their challenge. Claims for monthly rental of Rs. 10,000 and other damages were deemed unconvincing, particularly given the EWS qualification criteria of Rs. 25,000 annual income ceiling.

View Source

← Previous Next →

NCLAT dismissed appeals seeking compensation for delayed ...

Homebuyers' compensation claims for EWS flat delays rejected as prior consent bars challenge under Competition Act

February 5, 2025

Case Laws Law of Competition AT

You may also like:

Rejection of claims which are delayed - When an Application under Section 7 cannot be entertained for a debt, which is barred by time and is liable to be rejected, any...

CIRP - Delay in making claim - The case revolved around a Homebuyer's appeal regarding the delay in submitting their claim in an insolvency resolution process. Despite...

Rebate claim – refund claim was time barred - rebate claim was rightly rejected as time barred but the re-credit of duty paid in Cenvat account is not admissible - CGOVT

Claim of refund - Interest on delayed refund - limitation bar - Section 11BB - Price variation clause - the claim is hopelessly time barred. - AT

NCLAT dismissed an appeal u/s approval of Resolution Plan by dissenting Financial Creditors objecting to Homebuyers receiving flats without price escalation. Held that...

Claim of interest u/s 214 - claim of the assessee is for payment of compensation on account of the delay in payment of the interest amount - claim allowed - HC

The High Court addressed the issue of interim compensation u/s 143A of the NI Act, 1881 for dishonored cheques. It emphasized the need for a prima facie evaluation of...

Depreciation on sample flat - number of days asset used - the revenue has allowed the claim of 50% of the depreciation claimed by the assessee in the first year when the...

Claim of appellant rejected on the ground that Resolution Plan has been approved by the CoC - right to claim consideration of claim again in third round - NOIDA’s status...

Delay in possession of flats - if the developer, pays simple interest @ 12% per annum to the buyer, that would not only take care of the additional financial burden on...

Approval of a resolution plan - The Tribunal dismissed objections raised by dissenting homebuyers, citing that since the homebuyers as a class assented to the plans,...

Refund claim u/s 119 (2) (b) - condonation of delay - the land in question would be categorized as a capital asset. Therefore, the assessee cannot claim the benefit of...

Refund of anti-dumping duty paid by the petitioner - The High court found the petition misconceived, highlighting the petitioner's failure to fulfill basic requirements...

Profiteering - purchase of flat - The contention of the Respondent is dismissed that the excess (more than commensurate) benefit amounting to ₹ 3,91,714/- passed...

Section 7 application rejected as barred by Section 10A of IBC. Supreme Court held no bar in amending pleadings or filing additional documents u/s 7, but present case...

Quick Updates: