CBIC has clarified fee requirements for time extension ...

Duty Drawback Time Extension Applications Under Rules 6 & 7 Require Single Fee Regardless of Shipping Bills Count

February 6, 2025

Circulars Customs

CBIC has clarified fee requirements for time extension applications under Rules 6 and 7 of Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017. The Board addressed inconsistent practices across ports regarding application fees for duty drawback rate determinations. The clarification establishes that application fees for time extensions should be charged per application basis, not per shipping bill, even when multiple shipping bills are included in a single application. This resolves the divergent practices where some ports were charging fees per shipping bill while others charged per application. The ruling streamlines the fee structure for exporters seeking time extensions for duty drawback rate fixation applications.

View Source

← Previous

CBIC has clarified fee requirements for time extension ...

Duty Drawback Time Extension Applications Under Rules 6 & 7 Require Single Fee Regardless of Shipping Bills Count

February 6, 2025

Circulars Customs

You may also like:

The work pertaining to fixation of Brand Rate of Drawback under Rule 6 and Rule 7 of the Customs, Central Excise Duties and Service Tax Drawback Rules, 1995, in the GST scenario.

The assessee's request for fixation of special rate of brand-rate drawback was rejected due to non-fulfilment of basic requirements and time limitation. The assessee...

Refund of IGST amount and duty drawback - In view of the fact that the applications for refund of IGST and duty drawback are still pending, it is directed that the...

Recovery of drawback duty under Rule 16 of Drawback Rules – Respondent assessee made a statement that no All Industry Rate of drawback fixed or existing - Merely making...

Reversal of CENVAT Credit - the appellant have complied with the condition prescribed under Rule 6(3)(ii) read with sub-rule (3A) of Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules,...

Amends Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 - Rate of amount of reversal of Credit increased from 6% to 7% - Notification

Recovery of duty drawback already granted - mechanism is absent in Duty Drawback Rules, 1995 thus demand under Rule 16 of Drawback Rules, 1995 is not sustainable.

CENVAT credit - What is the meaning of expression “which are exempt from the duties of customs” under rule 6(6)(vii) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 - even 2.5% duty of...

Correctness of erasure of credit already availed by prospective invalidation of eligibility for retention of credit that would subject those services already procured...

Application of Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 - There is no percentage fixed in the Cenvat Credit Rules to decide that if dutiable goods are much below that...

Recovery of erroneous Duty Drawback - Rule 16 of the Drawback Rules, 1995 - By inserting Rule 20(2) government has shown its different intention and Rule 20(2) of...

Maintainability of application - in any case the definition of advance ruling does not permit making of an application in relation to the supply of services already...

Application u/s 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 maintainable only with court's liberty upon withdrawal of previous application. Principles of Order 23...

This case pertains to the precedence and priority of consideration between an application filed u/s 54(C) and Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC)...

Demand of excess paid drawback – recovery of duty drawback after revision in rate can be initiated u/s 11A read with Rule 16 of duty drawback rules, 1998 - CGOVT

Quick Updates: