CESTAT ruled on short payment of excise duty involving related ...

Related Parties' Excise Duty: Siblings' Company Selling to Parents' Firm Must Value Based on Distributor's Price

February 15, 2025

Case Laws Central Excise AT

CESTAT ruled on short payment of excise duty involving related parties under Section 4(3)(b) of Central Excise Act. Company directors (siblings) held 99% shares and made clearances to distributor firm owned by their parents, establishing related party relationship. Differential pricing pattern revealed mutual interest, with distributor receiving goods at lower prices. Tribunal held transaction value must be based on distributor's selling price per Rule 9 of CEVR 2000. Interest payment required on differential duty, though penalty was not imposed as department filed no cross-objection. Established principle prevents appellant from being placed in worse position upon appeal. Appeal rejected, affirming duty valuation and interest payment requirements.

View Source

← Previous Next →

CESTAT ruled on short payment of excise duty involving related ...

Related Parties' Excise Duty: Siblings' Company Selling to Parents' Firm Must Value Based on Distributor's Price

February 15, 2025

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Excise – sale through related parties, valuation provisions applicable – tribunal order reversed by SC

Disallowance u/s 40(A) - related party transaction - merely because there was an Agreement between the Assessee Company and the related party or the partnership firm,...

Appellate Tribunal's decision in identical matter of assessee for earlier period relied upon to dismiss department's appeal challenging determination of assessable value...

The firm is succeeded by the company, therefore, the cost of acquisition of the company would be as that of acquisition of the firm. The valuation of land and assets of...

Refund of excess payment of duty - Sale of goods through depot - Valuation - The duty is payable in accordance with the Section 4 of Central Excise Valuation Rules ,...

Valuation – joint venture – related parties - merely by holding 40% equity by the foreign company, Indian company cannot become a related person to the foreign company - AT

The appellant paid excise duty on the removal of inputs as such, based on the transaction value. However, this excise duty was found to be in excess of the actual CENVAT...

Transaction value - Valuation (Customs) - Special or abnormal discount to the related buyers which were in excess of 3% discount - The Appellate Tribunal observed that...

CIRP - discrimination of Related Party Financial or Operational Creditor - IBC treats related parties as a separate category for specified purposes, excluding from the...

CIRP proceedings - Financial Creditors - Related party - while the default rule under the first proviso to Section 21(2) is that only those financial creditors that are...

Transfer pricing adjustment made to alleged international transaction of AMP expenditure incurred by assessee disallowed due to lack of evidence that assessee agreed to...

Valuation (Central Excise) - Sale to related parties - the price to the related person cannot be called a non-commercial price since the same was higher than the price...

Valuation - export duty - Liability to pay customs duty on the FOB value, on export of iron ore fines considering the same as cum-duty value or otherwise - After...

Imposition of personal penalty on two Directors - valuation of goods - In any event, excise is a levy on manufacture and it is found that it is not the case of the...

Nature of Duty Paid by 100% Export Oriented Units (EOU) - The CESTAT held that while the measure adopted for computing duty paid by 100% EOUs may be based on customs...

Quick Updates: