AAAR upheld rejection of advance ruling application due to ...

AAAR Reject Advance Ruling Application Under Section 98(2) Due to Ongoing DGGI Investigation into Same Matter

February 27, 2025

Case Laws GST AAAR

AAAR upheld rejection of advance ruling application due to pre-existing proceedings under CGST Act. The appellant filed for advance ruling on 30.12.2022, after receiving summons from DGGI on 30.11.2022 and 20.12.2022. The term "any proceedings" in first proviso to Section 98(2) was interpreted broadly to include all scrutiny, inquiry, investigation, and assessment activities. AAAR distinguished this case from Radha Krishan Industries, noting that Section 83's restrictive interpretation of "proceedings" did not apply here. Since DGGI investigation preceded advance ruling application and concerned identical issues, the application was correctly rejected under Section 98(2) of CGST/TNGST Acts, 2017. Appeal dismissed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

AAAR upheld rejection of advance ruling application due to ...

AAAR Reject Advance Ruling Application Under Section 98(2) Due to Ongoing DGGI Investigation into Same Matter

February 27, 2025

Case Laws GST AAAR

You may also like:

AAAR upheld rejection of advance ruling application filed by appellant on 28.06.2022 regarding taxability of fees collected. Prior investigation by DGGI commenced with...

Scope of Advance Ruling - Validity of Ruling dated 20/01/2021 - The Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) declared the advance ruling void ab initio under section 104 of...

Maintainability of application for advance ruling - Classification of goods - Flavoured Milk - The application for advance ruling could not have been made in this case...

The application for advance ruling is liable for rejection under the first proviso to Section 98(2) of the CGST/TNGST Acts, 2017, as proceedings on the same issue were...

Advance Ruling application maintainable for recipient liable to pay tax on reverse charge basis, despite definition of 'advance ruling' - Section 95 to be interpreted...

The final decision in this case by the Odisha Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (AAAR) was set aside due to procedural irregularities and violation of principles of...

Proceedings under the CGST Act, 2017 encompass not just judicial proceedings but also assessment, audit, detention/seizure/release of goods and conveyances, even if they...

Supply or not - future contracts - works contract services - pure services or not - supply related to the business of pumping stations and reservoirs - The Authority...

Scope of advance ruling - AAR obtained the ruling by fraud or suppression of facts - misdeclaration of facts - search proceedings were initiated - appellant was also...

Classification of goods - preparation of Whole Wheat parota and Malabar parota - to be classified under Chapter heading 1905, attracting GST at the rate of 5% or...

The High Court considered an application for compounding contravention under FEMA. The petitioner filed Form FC-TRS belatedly, leading to investigations and complaints....

Maintainability of advance ruling application questioned due to pending classification issue before Customs Officer for 13 imported products used in Lithium-ion cell...

Rejection of application for Advance Ruling - Levy of GST - The appellate authority observed that the rejection of the advance ruling application was based on the...

Disallowance u/s 14A read with Rule 8D - the AO has not computed any disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(i) and Rule 8D(2)(ii) of the Rules and only under Rule 8D(2)(iii) of...

The applicant had suppressed material facts from the Authority for Advance Ruling by mis-declaring that the issue was not pending in any other proceedings, when in fact,...

Quick Updates: