HC quashed Tribunal's order regarding reopening of assessment ...

Investment Allowance Assessment Reopening Quashed: Tribunal Erred on Depreciation Disclosure Requirements for Trial Production Machinery

March 4, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax HC

HC quashed Tribunal's order regarding reopening of assessment based on alleged non-disclosure of unabsorbed investment allowance. The Tribunal erroneously concluded that depreciation claims for trial production machinery weren't shown in computation statements, despite no such requirement existing. Examining orders under s.143(3) and reassessment order dated 29.10.1999, AO had thoroughly considered depreciation based on complete disclosure by assessee. Finding no failure in true and full disclosure of material facts, HC deemed Tribunal's rejection of Misc. Application perverse. Matter remanded to Tribunal for fresh de-novo order, with assessee's Misc. Application allowed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

HC quashed Tribunal's order regarding reopening of assessment ...

Investment Allowance Assessment Reopening Quashed: Tribunal Erred on Depreciation Disclosure Requirements for Trial Production Machinery

March 4, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Carry forward of investment allowance - unabsorbed depreciation of Amalgamating Company - Section 72A - Claim allowed - HC

HC quashed reassessment notice under s.148 concerning lease payments, foreign currency transactions, and goodwill depreciation. Court found no valid grounds for...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - In case incorrect, wrong and non-existing reasons are recorded by the A.O. for reopening of the assessment and A.O. failed to verify...

Unabsorbed depreciation - whether unabsorbed depreciation should be allowed before the allowance of the unabsorbed investment allowance - This scrambled egg cannot be...

The Appellate Tribunal examined the reopening of assessment u/s 147 beyond the limitation period, involving the addition of cash deposits in the assessee's savings bank...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was challenged. The Assessing Officer (AO) had disallowed 20% of total sundry creditors in the regular assessment u/s 143(3). The AO...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was invalid as there was no failure by the assessee to disclose material facts. The assessment was reopened solely based on information...

The assessment years beyond six years but not exceeding ten years can be reopened u/s 153A only if the Assessing Officer possesses evidence depicting escapement of...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Reopening based on audit objections - reasons to believe - High Court observed that, reopening an assessment beyond four years requires...

Allowance of depreciation - depreciation on toll road as building - ownership of the assets - depreciation allowed - AT

The Assessing Officer (AO) reopened the assessment solely based on the information from a survey conducted by the Sales Tax Department, without independently examining...

Disallowing the investment allowance claimed u/s 32AC(1A) - The plain reading of Section 32AC makes it very clear in case the assessee claim depreciation on new asset...

Validity of reopening of assessment - It is well settled Law that validity of the reassessment proceedings is to be judged with reference to the reasons recorded for...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - reason to believe - there was tangible material before the AO to reopen the concluded assessment as the assessee is claiming huge...

Unabsorbed depreciation is to be added to the account of allowance of depreciation of the next year and as such merges with next year’s depreciation allowance - and...

Quick Updates: