NFRA found CA N Bansal guilty of professional misconduct under ...

CA N.Bansal Guilty of Professional Misconduct: Fined Rs. 5 Lakh and Debarred for Five Years

March 7, 2025

Case Laws Companies Law NFRA

NFRA found CA N Bansal guilty of professional misconduct under Section 132(4) of the Companies Act and Section 22 of the Chartered Accountants Act. The EP failed to timely report fraud to the Central Government, inadequately assessed fraud risks, failed to document sufficient evidence regarding audit procedures, and failed to obtain appropriate evidence for Deferred Tax Assets recognition. Given these violations, NFRA imposed a monetary penalty of Rs. 5,00,000 and debarred CA Bansal for five years from being appointed as an auditor or internal auditor or undertaking any audit of financial statements or internal audit functions of any company or body corporate.

View Source

← Previous Next →

NFRA found CA N Bansal guilty of professional misconduct under ...

CA N.Bansal Guilty of Professional Misconduct: Fined Rs. 5 Lakh and Debarred for Five Years

March 7, 2025

Case Laws Companies Law NFRA

You may also like:

The NFRA held that the Auditors were grossly negligent and failed to exercise due diligence in the audit of a public interest entity, amounting to professional...

The National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) held that the statutory auditors of Coffee Day Enterprises Limited (CDEL) committed professional misconduct u/s 132(4)...

Professional Misconduct - Chartered Accountant (CA) - Significant failures to adhere to Standards on Auditing (SAs), gross negligence, and lack of professional...

The NFRA held the Engagement Partner (EP) and Engagement Quality Control Reviewer (EQCR) guilty of professional misconduct u/ss 132(4), 22 of the Companies Act 2013 and...

Appellant imported fermented and dried processed Sumatra cocoa beans which failed to conform to IS 8865:2003 standards as per FSSAI and BIS testing. Adjudicating...

Professional misconduct by CA - The NFRA concluded that the actions of the firm and the engagement partner constituted professional misconduct. They failed to cooperate...

Levy of penalty in case of professional or other misconduct - minimum penalty reduced from ₹ 10 lakh rupees to 5 lakh rupees - Section 132(4) of the Companies Act, 2013

Contravention of Sections 8(1) and 9(1)(f)(i) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - receiving foreign exchange payments in 1996-97 through fake export documents...

Assessment u/s 153A - computation of income from house property. Additions proposed relate to unabated assessment years from 2013-14 onwards where no incriminating...

Rejection of declared transaction value under Valuation Rule 12, re-determination of value under Valuation Rules 4-9. Commissioner followed Rule 9, adopted actual values...

Addition of fixed deposits and interest thereon in wife's name was deleted as the Revenue could not controvert that the deposits belonged to the assessee's wife from her...

Professional Misconduct - Failure to report non-consolidation of subsidiary - Failure to prepare audit documentation - Failure to report issues related to disclosure of...

Professional Misconduct - Acceptance of audit engagement disregarding Independence requirements - Tampering of Audit File and related lapses-SA 230, Audit Documentation...

Petitioner sought regular bail in case involving alleged wrongful Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed using fictitious invoices from non-existent/suspicious firms. As per...

CA - Professional misconduct - respondent, while holding position of auditor of a company, agreed to act as an arbitrator/mediator in transaction of shares - respondent...

Quick Updates: