The HC determined that the Corporation's withholding of royalty ...

Royalty Payment Withholding Conditional; Petitioner Given Two Months to Submit Complete Claim Under Clause 35

March 10, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

The HC determined that the Corporation's withholding of royalty payment from the petitioner's work bill was conditional. The petitioner was granted liberty to submit a complete claim with all information requested in Annexure 'R/B' within two months. Upon receipt of the complete claim, the Corporation must consider it in accordance with law and Standard Bidding Document Clause 35. The Court clarified that the prima-facie opinion expressed in paragraph 4 of the Letter (Annexure 'R/B') should not impede fair consideration of the claim. The Corporation agreed to consider the petitioner's GST claim amount subject to submission of complete documentation. Application disposed of.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The HC determined that the Corporation's withholding of royalty ...

Royalty Payment Withholding Conditional; Petitioner Given Two Months to Submit Complete Claim Under Clause 35

March 10, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

TDS u/s 195 - payments by resident Indian end-user to non-resident computer software manufacturers/suppliers - payment for software licenses not royalty under Article 12...

TP Adjustment - Adjustment in the transaction of payment of royalty - Royalty payments made by the subsidiary for using certain intangible properties and services. - The...

Short payment of Service tax or not - provisional payment of service tax - It is an admitted fact that when the payment is made on provisional basis the amount sometime...

Relaxation in return filing procedure for first two months of GST implementation

The High Court examined whether payments made by an Indian company to its associated entity in the US for supply of computer software constituted "royalty" under the...

Finalisation of Provisional assessment - Two different block periods of four months and two months were taken only to satisfy the six month period as prescribed under...

Levy of interest for late deposit of TDS for two months instead of one month - delay of few days - the question of levy of interest for the second month can arise only...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) under section 195, specifically disallowance under section 40(a)(i) for payments labeled as...

Income accrued in India - royalty receipt - As noted that the definition of royalty under the ITA, prior to amendment in 2012, as well as the DTAAs under consideration...

Condonation of delay in filing application - fresh claim in CIRP - The prospective Resolution Applicants submitted their Resolution Plan on the basis of their financial...

Denial of refund claim - the date of deposit i.e. 10/12/2008 shall be excluded and six months shall be reckoned from 11/12/2008 and therefore the appellant's refund...

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the Explanations to Rule 38 of the Mineral (Other than Atomic and Hydrocarbons Energy Minerals) Concession Rules, 2016 and Rule...

Assessee filed second rectification application u/s 254, raising same grounds as first miscellaneous application which was already rejected. Tribunal held that except...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of characterizing interconnect utility charges (IUC) as 'Royalty' for TDS u/s 195 of the Income Tax Act and India-Japan DTAA....

Denial of refund claim -if credit is admissible in a particular month, it will be admissible in preceding and succeeding month also and exporter can claim refund after...

Quick Updates: