Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights March 2025 Year 2025 This

The CESTAT allowed an appeal against confiscation of 850.39 ...


Confiscation of Gold Overturned: Revenue Failed to Prove Smuggling While Appellants Showed Melted Jewelry Evidence

March 15, 2025

Case Laws     Customs     AT

The CESTAT allowed an appeal against confiscation of 850.39 grams of gold seized from a person in a town seizure case. The tribunal held that Section 113 of the Customs Act was inapplicable as there were no allegations of attempted export. While statements recorded under Section 108 are admissible evidence, they cannot be treated as conclusive proof without scrutiny. The tribunal found that the Revenue failed to establish reasonable belief that the gold was smuggled, while the appellants successfully demonstrated that the irregular gold pieces were produced by melting old jewelry. The tribunal determined that absolute confiscation and penalties were unjustified under these circumstances.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Customs Officers seized gold bars believing they were liable for confiscation under reasonable belief of smuggling. However, the gold was covered under proper documents,...

  2. Smuggling - Betel Nuts - foreign origin goods - town seizure - notified item or not - onus to prove - The CESTAT recognized that betel nuts were not notified items under...

  3. Appellant proved ownership of gold bars through valid invoices, discharging initial onus. Revenue failed to establish invoices unrelated to seized gold, lacking inquiry...

  4. Appellant financed an individual for smuggling gold from Dubai and selling it in India. Penalty was imposed u/s 112(b)(i) of the Customs Act, 1962. The Commissioner held...

  5. The appellant's gold was seized at the airport based on suspicions of smuggling. However, procedural irregularities, doubts about the voluntariness of the appellant's...

  6. 10kg of gold consisting of 10 gold bars, with 7 bars bearing foreign markings and 3 bars without markings, was seized along with cash from an employee of the appellant....

  7. CESTAT ruled against absolute confiscation of gold and penalties under s.112(b) of Customs Act, 1962. Officers seized gold based on alleged smuggling from Bangladesh,...

  8. Confiscation - town Seizure - Gold of foreign origin having inscription of 2(two) Swastika symbol - revenue has failed to prove reasonable belief that being the gold in...

  9. Smuggling - gold bullion of foreign origin - notified goods or not - burden to prove - The appellants have sufficiently discharged their burden of proof in terms of...

  10. Smuggling - Absolute confiscation of three gold bars and one small piece of remelted gold - Penalty u/s 112(a) and (b)(i) of Customs Act - The Tribunal noted that the...

  11. Smuggling - illegal importation of the seized gold - Confiscation of the gold and Indian currency - The Tribunal found no evidence linking the seized Indian currency to...

  12. CESTAT ruled in favor of appellants in a gold jewelry smuggling case, overturning earlier decisions by Adjudicating Authority and Commissioner (Appeals). The Tribunal...

  13. Levy of penalty u/s 112(b)(i) of the Customs Act 1962 - smuggling of Gold activity - reliability of statements - The appellant cannot come within the ambit of Section...

  14. Confiscating absolutely seven gold bars having foreign make marking - Smuggling - Hyundai Verna Car - sufficient evidence to prove foreign origin goods - The Tribunal...

  15. Smuggling - Gold - Seizure of gold - period of limitation - The appellant has able passed their onus of ownership acquisition of the gold in question. As the appellant...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates