Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Service Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights March 2025 Year 2025 This

CESTAT ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the ...


Composite Advertising Contracts: Service Tax Demand Set Aside as Proper Separation of Goods and Services Established

March 18, 2025

Case Laws     Service Tax     AT

CESTAT ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the service tax demand of Rs 5,94,38,654/- after finding no discrepancy between Balance Sheet and ST-3 returns once adjustments for sale of goods (Rs 13,35,68,175/-) and services under negative list (Rs 30,42,96,081/-) were made. The Tribunal also overturned the denial of CENVAT credit of Rs 97,36,884/-, recognizing that leasing space for billboards constituted legitimate input services for providing advertisement services. The court determined the composite contract properly separated advertisement services from goods sold, with appropriate service tax and VAT applied to respective components, consistent with Imagic Creative precedent. Late fees were invalidated due to reasonable delay caused by delayed collection of dues. The appeal was allowed with consequential reliefs.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Service tax demand on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services rendered on reverse charge basis set aside as appellant did not collect service tax from service recipient....

  2. The case involved a dispute regarding the classification of services provided by the appellant as Works Contract Service or Construction of Residential...

  3. Levy of Service Tax - liquidated damages received - The demand of service tax on late payment surcharge meter renting charges and supervision charges are set aside. The...

  4. The CESTAT held: The demand of service tax under 'site formation service' for June 2005 to May 2007 by culling out site formation charges from a composite mining...

  5. CESTAT ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside service tax demands on two grounds. First, the tribunal determined that the supply of DG sets to IOCL constituted a...

  6. Erection, Commissioning or Installation Service (ECIS) - Had there been a break up of the material and the service components in the contract itself, the demand would...

  7. Various Service tax issues related to different activities undertaken by the appellant. The key points are: service tax demand on operation and maintenance of ropeway...

  8. Demand for service tax on commission received on vehicle sales, sales promotion, and incentives under 'Business Auxiliary Services' set aside as show cause notice failed...

  9. Liability to pay service tax for services provided to a foreign entity. The appellant argued that their turnover within the domestic market was below the threshold...

  10. The CESTAT held that the agreements between the appellant (a builder/developer) and prospective buyers for construction of residential units are to be treated as works...

  11. Non-payment of service tax on management consultancy services, royalty services, intellectual property right services, business auxiliary services, and banking and...

  12. Classification of services - composite mining contract - Vivisecting the composite contract and charging service tax on different components of the contract individually...

  13. Appellant provided services of loading, unloading, shifting, and transportation of iron ore under separate contracts. CESTAT held it was a composite service for...

  14. Erection, Commissioning and Installation Services - composite contract - Commissioner (Appeals) has travelled beyond the Show Cause Notice to confirm the demand under...

  15. Recovery of service tax u/s 73(2) of Finance Act, 1994 and section 174 of CGST Act, 2017 with interest and penalty was challenged. The issue pertained to classification...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates