Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights March 2025 Year 2025 This

The HC upheld the ITAT's deletion of additions under section 68, ...


Share Capital Investments Validated: Assessee Successfully Proves Identity, Creditworthiness, and Genuineness Under Section 68

March 20, 2025

Case Laws     Income Tax     HC

The HC upheld the ITAT's deletion of additions under section 68, confirming that the assessee had successfully discharged the burden of proving identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of shareholders' investments. The Court found that both appellate authorities had thoroughly examined available records and concurrently determined that the investors were existing shareholders with sufficient funds and properly disclosed past transactions. The HC declined to interfere with these findings, noting that while the AO had examined the materials, conclusions were recorded without supporting reasons, rendering such findings perverse. The Court affirmed the ITAT's reliance on CIT v. Divine Leasing & Finance Ltd. and dismissed the revenue's appeal.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The assessee company received share capital and share application money from 13 share applicants. The Assessing Officer (AO) made an addition u/s 68, alleging that the...

  2. Unexplained share capital and premium received by assessee company was its own unaccounted money flowing back in form of premium on share allotment. Assessee filed...

  3. In a case concerning unexplained credit u/s 68, the assessee proved the identity and genuineness of share applicants, although their creditworthiness was questioned. The...

  4. Assessee company successfully proved genuineness of share capital and share premium received from various private limited companies. Creditworthiness and identity of...

  5. Unexplained share capital/share premium - proof of genuine investors - the assessee has been able to prove identity of the share applicants, their creditworthiness and...

  6. Non-proving identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of share premium received cannot be treated as unexplained income if sufficient documentary evidence is provided....

  7. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 for addition u/s 68 on share premium received by petitioner from Gold Singapore was challenged. Reassessment proceedings initiated...

  8. Addition u/s 68 - onus to prove the identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of the share applicants - Both the nature & source of the share application received was...

  9. Addition u/s 68 - unexplained credit - Onus to prove - share capital introduced - the assessee failed to explain the sources of investment of cash of Rs. 10 lacs each by...

  10. The assessee successfully discharged the onus u/s 68 regarding share capital introduced by the company director, a major shareholder, proving identity, creditworthiness,...

  11. Unexplained share capital and share premium - Not only the assessee has proved the identity and creditworthiness of the investors and genuineness of the transactions by...

  12. Correct head of income - Gain on sale of shares - nature of purchase of shares either as “investment” or “stock-in-trade” - AO has not given any clear cut finding that...

  13. Nature of expenditure - addition of write off of investments - the claim of loss accruing or arising as investment in equity shares, non-convertible debentures and zero...

  14. Addition u/s 68 - share application money received as unaccounted cash credit - identity and creditworthiness of the share subscribers and genuineness of the transaction...

  15. Addition u/s 68 - bogus share capital & share premium - The assessee failed to prove that the transactions of share application money is genuine and the creditworthiness...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates