The HC directed respondent No. 1 to consider the petitioner's ...

Authorities Directed to Consider GST Non-Payment Allegations and Issue Speaking Order Within Two Weeks

March 20, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

The HC directed respondent No. 1 to consider the petitioner's representations regarding non-payment of GST and other alleged offenses by respondent No. 2. A speaking order must be issued within two weeks, with discretion given to respondent No. 1 to hear both parties before making the determination. The petition was allowed, though the Court did not directly order registration of an FIR as requested, instead mandating proper consideration of the petitioner's complaints through appropriate administrative channels with a time-bound resolution requirement.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The HC directed respondent No. 1 to consider the petitioner's ...

Authorities Directed to Consider GST Non-Payment Allegations and Issue Speaking Order Within Two Weeks

March 20, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

Challenge to the State GST authorities demanding input tax credit availed by the petitioner along with interest and penalty for IGST paid on manpower supply services...

Seeks to refund the GST - deposited against the non-migrated GST - The petitioner argued that they had only been using the migrated GST number and were surprised to...

The High Court addressed the issue of parallel proceedings initiated by both State and Central GST Authorities against the petitioner for the same assessment years. For...

HC ruled on GST reimbursement dispute between petitioner and government entity. Acknowledging State GST Department's confirmation of rate increase from 12% to 18%, court...

The circular clarifies the time of supply for GST payment on spectrum allocation services when telecom operators opt for deferred payments. The bidder is liable to pay...

Blocking GST registration number - Upon such representations being made, the authorities are directed to consider the same and unlock the GST registration so that the...

HC set aside GST demand order dated 21.11.2024 for non-consideration of binding departmental circulars (No.200/12/2023-GST and No.236/30/2024-GST). Matter remanded to...

The High Court considered the validity of a notice issued u/s 65 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 regarding GST Audit. The writ petition challenged the...

Goods and Services Tax Notification issued in Central GST, Integrated GST, UT GST, Compensation Cess etc.

GST Authorities invoked penal provisions under Indian Penal Code against the petitioner without invoking penal provisions of GST Act, despite the alleged offences being...

Validity of criminal proceedings initiated - Non-payment of GST - non-appearance at any date against four summons issued to the accused - The documents on record clearly...

The High Court examined the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer (AO) and the prescribed income-tax authority to issue notices u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. It held...

In cases of spectrum allocation where the telecom operator opts for deferred payment instalments as per the Frequency Assignment Letter (FAL) issued by Department of...

HC addressed payment procedures for GST demands under rule 142. Petitioner paid demand through Form GST DRC-03 instead of required electronic liability register Form GST...

GST is applicable on mining lease payments, including royalty, payable to the Government of Rajasthan under reverse charge mechanism (RCM) at 18% (9% CGST and 9% SGST)....

Quick Updates: