HC ruled on GST reimbursement dispute between petitioner and ...

Government Must Reimburse 6% GST Rate Difference After Rate Hike From 12% to 18% Within Three Months

March 4, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

HC ruled on GST reimbursement dispute between petitioner and government entity. Acknowledging State GST Department's confirmation of rate increase from 12% to 18%, court directed respondent to reimburse petitioner for differential GST amount of 6% for period January 1-24, 2022. Payment must be made within three months of certified order copy receipt. Non-compliance will attract 6% per annum interest from entitlement date. Court disposed petition despite alternative remedy availability under Arbitration Act, considering direct involvement of GST authorities and rate enhancement confirmation.

View Source

← Previous Next →

HC ruled on GST reimbursement dispute between petitioner and ...

Government Must Reimburse 6% GST Rate Difference After Rate Hike From 12% to 18% Within Three Months

March 4, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

The petitioner sought reimbursement of the additional 6% GST paid from 01.01.2022 to 30.09.2022, as the respondents were paying bills with 12% GST while the petitioner...

The HC held that the respondent no. 2, a government entity, is liable to pay the petitioner the difference in GST amount at 6% from 01.01.2022 to 30.09.2022 within three...

HC determined that the contractor was liable to pay GST at 18% on taxable turnover from works contract, while respondent had only reimbursed 12%. Based on contractual...

The High Court allowed the petition and directed the respondent No. 2, a government entity, to pay the petitioner the difference in GST amount at the enhanced rate of...

The transportation of coal (minerals) within a mining area, such as from the mining pit head or coal stockyard to the railway siding or beneficiation plant, for a...

The works rendered by the applicant involving application of polymer protective coating for bridges, as part of construction or routine maintenance/renovation, falls...

GST Council recommends formation of Group of Ministers to study GST on life and health insurance, and future of compensation cess. Exemption recommended for research and...

The applicant M/s. Kerala Land Development Corporation Ltd. (M/s. KLDC), a fully owned Government Undertaking, falls under the definition of "Governmental Entity"...

Refund claim towards excess custom duty paid - same amount paid twice through oversight and bonafide mistake - The petitioner is entitled to get refund along with...

This circular clarifies GST rates and classification for certain goods based on recommendations of the GST Council's 54th meeting. Key points: Extruded/expanded savoury...

Four-tier GST rate structure of 5, 12, 18, 28 percent has been announced by the GST Council in addition to zero rated goods

Rate of Interest on delayed refund - whether the appellant is entitled for interest on the delayed payment of refund either at the rate of 6% or at the rate of 12% of...

The HC addressed the dispute regarding differential GST liability payment. Following precedent established in M/s Apex Structure case, the court affirmed that GST rate...

Violation of the principles of natural justice - Validity of GST assessment order - it is the case of increase in GST from 12% to 18% for works contract executed for the...

Classification of service - rate of tax applicable for works contract - construction of a structure meant predominantly for use as a cultural establishment - The...

Quick Updates: