The ITAT ruled that additions under section 69A regarding ...

Unexplained Income Additions Under Section 69A Deleted Where Cash Withdrawals Were Redeposited Without Diversion

March 24, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

The ITAT ruled that additions under section 69A regarding unexplained income were unjustified as the Assessing Officer failed to prove that cash withdrawals were used elsewhere before being redeposited. The Tribunal deleted additions related to sales of Renault Fluence and Santro cars where the appellant had furnished complete purchaser details. However, the addition for Mercedes Benz sale was sustained as the appellant failed to establish transaction genuineness beyond claiming it was sold through an agent. The Tribunal also upheld additions under section 68 for alleged joint venture contributions from Prabhatsinhji Thakor, as the appellant failed to demonstrate the contributor's creditworthiness. Similarly, additions under section 69A for purported bogus share sales were maintained due to insufficient evidence of cash payment from the purchasing company.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The ITAT ruled that additions under section 69A regarding ...

Unexplained Income Additions Under Section 69A Deleted Where Cash Withdrawals Were Redeposited Without Diversion

March 24, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The ITAT Bangalore addressed unexplained cash deposits u/s 69A, focusing on the credibility of earlier withdrawals as a source for redeposits. The Tribunal examined fund...

Addition u/s 68 - Cash deposited in Bank - Assessee re-circulated those moneys by way of deposits, withdrawals and redeposits in the Bank A/c from time to time and the...

Key legal issues and the Tribunal's holdings: Agricultural land sold by assessee situated beyond municipal limits cannot be treated as capital asset u/s 2(14). Addition...

Addition being 40% of cash balance shown in the balance sheet as income of the assessee - A.O without any basis, simply says that the cash in hand is excessive and...

Addition u/s 69A - cash balance on account of withdrawal from different bank accounts - The mere fact of holding cash for a longer period was not a sufficient ground for...

Cash deposit in bank account treated as unexplained income - Agricultural income or not? - The Tribunal found discrepancies in the appellant's claims regarding...

Addition u/s 68 - Cash loan and interest income earned on such cash loan unexplained - It is not understandable as how the cash loan are unexplained, when the AO has not...

The assessee, a septuagenarian gynecologist with no business income during the year, made cash deposits totaling Rs. 10 lakh in her bank account during demonetization....

The ITAT held that once the source of cash is taxed, it cannot be further taxed as unexplained cash expenditure in the hands of the assessee company. The assessee had...

The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, considered the penalty u/s 271AAA for unexplained cash found during a search. The AO rejected the assessee's submissions due to lack of...

The Appellate Tribunal held that the addition u/s 56(2)(vii) or 28(iv) was unjustified, as the purchase was made with consideration, cheques were given to sellers with...

Unexplained cash payments - There is also no evidence to suggest that cash withdrawn from ETLL was unused and kept with the assessee idle though repeatedly withdrawals...

Addition u/s 68 r.w. section 115BBE - unexplained cash deposits in the bank account - The tribunal finds that the AO did not provide a satisfactory explanation for...

Unexplained money u/s 69A read with Section 115BBE(1) - no explanation regarding source of cash deposit in savings account - case selected for limited scrutiny, thus...

Addition u/s 69A - unexplained income - cash deposits made into bank account during demonetization period - assessee neither furnished stock summary nor bills/vouchers...

Quick Updates: