ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee across multiple taxation ...

Tribunal Validates Assessee's Tax Treatment, Rejects Revenue Department's Contentions Across Multiple Taxation Challenges

April 5, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee across multiple taxation issues. The tribunal found no merit in the revenue department's contentions regarding management consultancy charges, sales tax subsidy recognition, section 14A disallowance, and ad hoc expense disallowance. The key determinations include: (1) management consultancy expenses were justified based on business growth; (2) sales tax subsidy should be recognized when conditions are fulfilled; (3) no exempt income was earned from investments, rendering section 14A disallowance unjustified; and (4) ad hoc expense disallowance lacks substantive reasoning. Consequently, the ITAT deleted additions made by the assessing officer and upheld the assessee's tax treatment, effectively rendering the proceedings revenue neutral.

View Source

← Previous Next →

ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee across multiple taxation ...

Tribunal Validates Assessee's Tax Treatment, Rejects Revenue Department's Contentions Across Multiple Taxation Challenges

April 5, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The ITAT rejected the Revenue's appeal concerning disallowance of exemption under s.10(23C)(vi). The Tribunal accepted the assessee's contention that the AO failed to...

The ITAT held that where the assessee entered into a unilateral Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) with the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) and complied with its...

Assessee followed joint venture model for sharing revenue with collaborators as per franchise agreement. Assessee recorded all revenues, incurred expenditure, and shared...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal examined the determination of net profits from contract business, rejection of books of accounts, and addition u/s 40(a)(ia) for...

Treatment of sales tax refund as income under section 41(1) - Decided against the revenue.

The key points covered in the summary are: The assessee claimed tax deducted at source (TDS) on prize winnings from unsold lottery tickets as business income and set off...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of refund of excess taxes claimed by the Assessee due to a difference in the amount of TDS and Advance Tax as computed by the...

The assessee claimed that no capital gain was chargeable on receipt from transfer of trademark as there was no cost of acquisition. However, the tribunal held that the...

The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal regarding foreign tax credit for state taxes paid in the United States under Section 91, despite the existence of an India-USA...

The assessee, a non-resident corporate entity incorporated in Austria, earned income from the sale of software licenses. The Assessing Officer (AO) computed the profit...

Income assessed in hands of Appellant as Representative Assessee. No credit for prepaid taxes availed by beneficiaries. JCIT(A) directed AO to verify claim of prepaid...

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal u/s 249(4)(b) due to non-payment of advance tax. The assessee did not respond to the notice u/s 142(1) to clarify tax payment....

The HC declined to entertain the petition challenging the Tribunal's decision under Section 254(2) regarding TP adjustment for guarantee fees paid to an Associated...

The Appellate Tribunal considered two main issues: 1. Addition u/s 37(1) - Assessee incurred business loss due to default in property payment, allowed as revenue loss. 2....

The Appellate Tribunal considered the issue of exemption u/s 11 regarding the non-utilization of 85% of grants-in-aid received during the year. The Tribunal found that...

Quick Updates: