HC dismisses petition regarding vicarious liability under ...

Former Director Not Liable for Company Cheque Bounce: Resignation Breaks Criminal Responsibility Under Section 141 NI Act

April 8, 2025

Case Laws Indian Laws HC

HC dismisses petition regarding vicarious liability under Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act. The court upheld that a former director cannot be held criminally responsible for cheque dishonour after her resignation, absent specific evidence of continued control or involvement in company affairs. The ruling emphasizes that mere prior association or familial connections are insufficient to establish vicarious liability. The court found no material demonstrating the director's consent, connivance, or neglect in cheque issuance, thereby rejecting criminal proceedings against her under Sections 138 and 141 of the NI Act.

View Source

← Previous Next →

HC dismisses petition regarding vicarious liability under ...

Former Director Not Liable for Company Cheque Bounce: Resignation Breaks Criminal Responsibility Under Section 141 NI Act

April 8, 2025

Case Laws Indian Laws HC

You may also like:

HC ruled in favor of petitioner, quashing criminal proceedings under Negotiable Instruments Act Sections 138/141. Director's unilateral resignation was deemed valid from...

Dishonor of Cheque - Vicarious liability of Director - The primary liability in a cheque bounce case where cheque has been issued on behalf of the company is upon the...

Dishonour of Cheque - vicarious liability of the director - The Court found that, the resignation of the directors, as recorded in Form 32, indicates their...

Dishonor of Cheque - insufficient funds - vicarious liability of the petitioner u/s 141 of NI Act after tendering such resignation - the complainant should specifically...

Dishonour of Cheque - vicarious liability of director - The petitioners argued that they had resigned from their directorship well before the cheque was issued and could...

Dishonour of cheque - vicarious liability in criminal law - The SC interpreted Section 7 of the NI Act to identify the "drawer" as the individual issuing the cheque,...

Dishonour of Cheque - vicarious liability of Director of the Company - The petitioner, a former non-executive additional director of the accused company, contended that...

- Dishonor of Cheque - vicarious liability of Director - The Petitioner resigned from the Company on 05.02.2016. Therefore, as per the details regarding the Directors of...

Effect of resignation from Directorship - ROC refused to remove the name of the Petitioner as a Director of Respondent No. 4-company - The High court acknowledged the...

The petition challenged the criminal complaint filed against the petitioner u/s 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonor of cheque. The...

HC ruled in favor of company directors, quashing criminal proceedings under NI Act for dishonored cheques. Court determined petitioners successfully demonstrated they...

The High Court held that the penalty imposed on a company cannot be recovered from its former director u/s the Companies Act. The director cannot be held personally...

Effective date of Resignation from the post of Managing Director - Compiling Proceedings against the Director / Petitioner for Non-appointment of Woman Director in the...

Dishonor of Cheque - vicarious liability of an independent director - In absence of any specific averments or allegations carving out a specific role attributable to...

HC ruled that a Managing Director cannot be held vicariously liable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act for a dishonored cheque that was not drawn by their...

Quick Updates: