AT found appellant failed to provide credible explanation for ...

Unexplained Cash Possession: Inconsistent Statements Sink Appellant's Credibility in Financial Scrutiny Case

April 12, 2025

Case Laws Benami Property AT

AT found appellant failed to provide credible explanation for possession of Rs. 87,15,472/- in cash. Appellant's statements were inconsistent, changing multiple times regarding the source of currency notes. Despite claiming notes were for exchange from multiple persons, only two summoned individuals denied providing currency. Appellant could not produce documentary evidence supporting his claim of exchanging torn/soiled notes or justifying retention during Code of Conduct period. Contradictory statements regarding ownership, including sudden inclusion of father's involvement, undermined appellant's credibility. AT upheld Adjudicating Authority's order, finding appellant's narrative unreliable and dismissing the appeal.

View Source

← Previous Next →

AT found appellant failed to provide credible explanation for ...

Unexplained Cash Possession: Inconsistent Statements Sink Appellant's Credibility in Financial Scrutiny Case

April 12, 2025

Case Laws Benami Property AT

You may also like:

Unexplained money u/s 69A r.w.s. 115BBE - Cash seized in search - The assessee provided a cash reconciliation statement, demonstrating that the cash balance remained...

Inflated cost of land - GAAP v/s Ind AS for financial statement recording - As per the guidelines given by the Government of India, the assessee was required to prepare...

Addition u/s 68 or 56(2) - Unexplained cash credit u/s 68 - share transactions - the valuation aspect of the shares is made on the Discounted cash flow method (DCF) and...

Cash deposits made during demonetization period from cash withdrawals and rental income received in cash were substantiated through cash flow statements and bank...

ITAT allowed taxpayer's appeal against additions made for unexplained cash and jewelry found during search proceedings. The Tribunal held that mere possession of cash...

Addition u/s 68 - unexplained cash credit - Onus to prove - The High court noted that the assessee had provided sufficient evidence, including bank statements, cash-flow...

Unexplained cash credit - addition of cash deposit in bank account - It is important to mention here that the bank statements cannot be termed as books of accounts for...

The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, considered the penalty u/s 271AAA for unexplained cash found during a search. The AO rejected the assessee's submissions due to lack of...

Addition u/s 68 - Cash loan and interest income earned on such cash loan unexplained - It is not understandable as how the cash loan are unexplained, when the AO has not...

Unexplained cash credit u/s 68 - When the cash did not pass at any stage and since the respective parties did not receive cash nor did pay any cash, there was no real...

Unexplained money u/s 69A read with Section 115BBE(1) - no explanation regarding source of cash deposit in savings account - case selected for limited scrutiny, thus...

ITAT set aside unexplained money additions under s.69A made on cash found in possession of employee. Despite assessee's retraction from statement under s.131, initial...

Statement of Financial Transactions (SFT) for Depository Transactions - Method for computation of "The Estimated Sale Consideration for the debit transaction" and...

The assessee's unexplained cash credits u/s 68 were deleted by the CIT(A) after accepting the submissions that the cash receipts from various sources like cash sales,...

Unexplained cash credit u/s 68 - supporting evidences to substantiate the source of cash found from the possession - Assessee has shown a taxable income of Rs. 2.30...

Quick Updates: