NCLAT dismissed the appeal challenging a procedural order ...

NCLAT Rejects Appeal Against Procedural Order, Upholds Submission Recording Without Diluting Party Rights Under Rule

April 14, 2025

Case Laws Companies Law AT

NCLAT dismissed the appeal challenging a procedural order related to a company petition. The tribunal held that the impugned order did not dilute any party's rights and was merely a procedural order recording submission of notes. The appellant failed to challenge the main order dated 18.12.2024 and had already complied with previous directions by filing submissions. Consequently, the appeal challenging the procedural order was deemed non-maintainable, consistent with established judicial precedent that procedural orders are not independently appealable. The appeal was dismissed without addressing the substantive merits of the underlying company petition.

View Source

← Previous Next →

NCLAT dismissed the appeal challenging a procedural order ...

NCLAT Rejects Appeal Against Procedural Order, Upholds Submission Recording Without Diluting Party Rights Under Rule

April 14, 2025

Case Laws Companies Law AT

You may also like:

NCLAT proceedings - Requirements from the parties before the NCLAT to file brief written submissions and copies of the judgments - even assuming that there was no...

The NCLAT being the duly constituted Appellate Tribunal, under the IBC, is free to regulate its procedure and the manner in which it wishes to hear matters, including...

Valuation- inter-connected undertaking - related parties or not - applicability of doctrine of mutuality of interest - The fact that Appellant 1 and Appellant 2 were not...

Validity of demand - order has been passed without proper notice to petitioner - Before passing any order, a personal hearing shall be given to petitioner with atleast...

The NCLAT erred in invoking its inherent powers u/r 11 of the NCLAT Rules 2016 to approve a settlement between the second respondent and the Corporate Debtor,...

The NCLAT allowed the approval of the New Board's decision to collapse/unwind transactions whereby IFIN provided loans to third parties, except for certain respondents...

Rule 48 of the NCLAT Rules clearly stipulates service of notice on the other side, pursuant to issuance of notice by the NCLAT in the appeal, regardless of supply of...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - it appears that the AO has recorded to the effect that he could not refer the matter to the Transfer Pricing Officer nor could he...

Ex post facto approval granted to a respondent for foreign investment violated principles of natural justice. A committee was constituted to examine rival contentions,...

Contempt Jurisdiction - Approval of Resolution Plan - Undoubtedly, the conduct of DVI has not been bona fide. - DVI was not just seeking an extension of time but a...

The NCLAT rejected the intervention application filed by the Appellant for approval of the Resolution Plan u/s 30 of the I&B Code. The Appellant was an unsuccessful...

Disallowance u/s 14A - necessity of recording satisfaction - Dissatisfaction of the AO is expressly recorded in the assessment order. The said dissatisfaction has been...

Validity of deed of assignment - Related Party - if the Assignor of a debt is a Related Party of the Corporate Debtor, as per the ratio laid down by the Hon'ble NCLAT,...

Inclusion of name of applicant in the CoC - related party or not - the Applicant is stepping into the shoes of the Assignor and thereby takes over the right of the...

If a party thinks that the happenings in court have been wrongly recorded in a judgment, it is incumbent upon the party, while the matter is still fresh in the minds of...

Quick Updates: