Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2002 (2) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2002 (2) TMI 1073 - AT - Central Excise

Issues:
1. Eligibility of carbon tubes and sleeves as modvatable inputs under Rule 57A.
2. Challenge on the ground of limitation for availing Modvat credit.

Analysis:

Issue 1:
The main issue in this appeal was whether carbon tubes and sleeves could be considered eligible modvatable inputs under Rule 57A for the manufacture of tungsten carbide products. The appellant argued that these inputs were crucial for the carburization and sintering processes, essential for maintaining the required carbon balance in the final product. The appellant relied on a previous Tribunal decision that recognized similar items as inputs. The Tribunal found that the detailed use of carbon sleeves and tubes demonstrated their integral role in the manufacturing process. Consequently, the Tribunal held that denying Modvat credit for these inputs would be unjustified.

Issue 2:
The appellant also challenged the impugned order on the ground of limitation, as the Modvat credit was availed after filing a declaration, and a show cause notice was issued after a significant gap, alleging deliberate misrepresentation. The Tribunal noted that the Deputy Commissioner had not provided substantial evidence to support the claim that the declaration was intentionally incorrect. The appellant had consistently submitted relevant documents to the department, including the acknowledgment of the declaration by the proper officer. As a result, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on the point of limitation, concluding that there was no intentional suppression of material facts to avail incorrect Modvat credit.

In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellants, providing them with consequential relief. Additionally, the stay petition was disposed of in light of the decision.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates