2006 (3) TMI 320 - SC - Central Excise

Whether cotton based tarpaulin is exigible to sales tax under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963? Held that - Appeal allowed. Refering to the exclusion clause in entry 11 in the Third Schedule to the KGST Act it means that where duty has not been levied under the ADEA such goods would be excluded from the purview of entry 11; to put it simply, the goods would lose their exemption under the KGST Act. For this reason also, we hold that cotton based tarpaulin is exempted from sales tax under the KGST Act. Thus the High Court was wrong in denying exemption from sales tax under the KGST Act to the cotton based tarpaulin manufactured by the appellant.

Summary

Issues Involved:
- Whether cotton based tarpaulin is exigible to sales tax under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963.

Analysis:

Issue 1: Exigibility of Cotton Based Tarpaulin to Sales Tax
The case revolved around the question of whether cotton-based tarpaulin is subject to sales tax under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963. The appellant argued that cotton-based tarpaulin should be exempt from sales tax as it falls under the category of "cotton fabrics" as per the relevant schedules of the Act. The appellant also relied on the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957, stating that goods subject to additional duty are exempt from sales tax. The Revenue, on the other hand, contended that tarpaulin, being specifically included in various entries of the First Schedule, is liable to sales tax. The High Court's decision was based on the principle of specific entry taking precedence over general entry for taxation purposes.

Analysis of Arguments:
- The appellant's position was supported by the interpretation that cotton-based tarpaulin falls under the exemption provided for "cotton fabrics" in the Third Schedule of the Act.
- The Revenue's stance was that the specific inclusion of tarpaulin in the First Schedule indicated its liability to sales tax, overriding any general exemptions.
- The Tribunal's analysis confirmed that cotton-based tarpaulin is covered under the term "cotton fabrics" in the relevant tariff entries, supporting the appellant's claim for exemption.
- The High Court's reliance on the specific over general entry principle was deemed inapplicable as the issue was about exemption rather than dual taxation.

Court's Decision:
The Supreme Court held in favor of the appellant, ruling that cotton-based tarpaulin is indeed exempt from sales tax under the KGST Act. The Court emphasized that the exemption under the Act continued despite the specific inclusion of tarpaulin in the First Schedule. The judgment highlighted that the legislative intent must be derived from the statutory language, and as long as the exemption provision remained unaltered, cotton-based tarpaulin would remain exempt. The Court also underscored the relevance of the Additional Duties of Excise Act in determining the exemption status of the goods. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the decisions of the High Court and Tribunal were set aside, granting exemption from sales tax to cotton-based tarpaulin.

Conclusion:
The detailed analysis of the legal provisions, historical amendments to the schedules, and the interpretation of relevant Acts led to the conclusion that cotton-based tarpaulin qualifies for exemption from sales tax under the KGST Act. The judgment clarified the legislative intent behind the exemptions and upheld the appellant's claim based on the statutory provisions and historical context of the taxation framework.

---