Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2002 (6) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2002 (6) TMI 486 - AT - Customs

Issues:
1. Non-export of jewellery made from imported gold.
2. Imposition of penalties under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962.
3. Confiscation of gold plated silver jewellery.

Issue 1: Non-export of jewellery made from imported gold
The case involved M/s. Pretty Woman setting up a unit in a designated zone for manufacturing and exporting gold jewellery. They received gold on loan basis from a nominated agency but failed to export the jewellery made from it. The Commissioner imposed penalties for non-export of jewellery made from non-duty paid gold procured from the agency.

Issue 2: Imposition of penalties under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962
The appellants contested the penalties imposed under Section 112, arguing that confiscation of goods under Section 111 is a prerequisite for imposing penalties. They also highlighted that the proceedings against the agency had been settled with a significant duty liability and penalty. The Tribunal noted that the Commissioner's order did not consider all contentions raised by the appellants, leading to a remand for a fresh order with a fair hearing for the appellants.

Issue 3: Confiscation of gold plated silver jewellery
The Commissioner ordered the confiscation of gold plated silver jewellery due to non-compliance with duty regulations. However, the Tribunal set aside this order along with the penalties imposed, remanding the case for a reevaluation considering all aspects and providing the appellants with a fair opportunity to present their case. The decision emphasized the need for a comprehensive reconsideration based on all relevant developments and contentions presented by the appellants.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates