Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + HC Companies Law - 2004 (4) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2004 (4) TMI 309 - HC - Companies Law

Issues:
Petition under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act for sanction of Scheme of Amalgamation with another company.

Analysis:

1. The petitioner-company, a Private Limited Company, sought sanction for a Scheme of Amalgamation with another company. Both companies decided to merge based on their business strategies and commercial interests. The scheme included all aspects of assets, liabilities, reserves, investments, and employee-related matters, with the petitioner-company to be dissolved without winding up.

2. The petitioner-company applied to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and creditors, which was approved by the High Court. The Court noted that as the petitioner-company was a wholly owned subsidiary of the transferee-company, no separate application from the transferee-company was required, following a similar judgment in Mahamba Investment Ltd. v. IDI Ltd.

3. The scheme was found to be fair, reasonable, and in the interest of all parties involved. The financial position of the transferee-company was strong, and the merger would increase its net worth. No investigation proceedings were pending under relevant sections of the Companies Act, and individual notices to unsecured creditors were dispensed with.

4. Affidavits were filed to prove service and publication of the petition. The Regional Director of the Department of Company Affairs and the Official Liquidator found no objections to the scheme, stating it was not prejudicial to creditors or shareholders. No adverse material was presented by any party during the hearing.

5. The Court emphasized that unless a scheme is unfair, unreasonable, contrary to law, or public policy, judicial review in such matters is limited. In this case, as there were no serious objections or prejudice, the Court granted sanction to the Scheme of Amalgamation as prayed for.

6. The Court allowed the Company Petition in terms of the prayer clauses, with costs to be paid to the Regional Director and Official Liquidator by the petitioner within a specified timeframe.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates