Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2003 (11) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2003 (11) TMI 413 - AT - Central Excise

Issues: Classification of TOCOFER Capsules under Chapter 3003.10 vs. Heading 29.36

Classification under Chapter 3003.10:
The appellant, a manufacturer of P. P. Medicines, appealed against the classification of TOCOFER Capsules as medicaments under Chapter 3003.10. The lower authorities had classified TOCOFER and another entity as medicaments, while the Department claimed the goods should be classified under Heading 29.36 covering Vitamins and Provitamins. The Commissioner (Appeals) classified TOCOFER Capsules under Heading 29.36 and the other entity under Heading 3003.13. The Tribunal analyzed the literature and prescription details of TOCOFER Capsules, noting they are capsules of Vitamin E in various presentations without admixture, prescribed for different conditions. The mode of presentation, packaging, and prescription indicated that TOCOFER Capsules could be considered a medicament under Chapter 2 to Chapter 30 of the Central Excise Tariff, possibly as a patent or proprietary medicament. The Tribunal applied Rule 3(c) of the Tariff Interpretation Rules, preferring Heading 3003.10 over 29.36 due to numerical order. The absence of chapter notes in Chapter 29 excluding the entity under consideration, along with HSN heading notes, supported the classification under 3003.10. Previous Tribunal decisions and the appellant's regulation by Drug Central Authorities further reinforced the classification under Heading 3003.10.

Decision and Conclusion:
After considering the material on record, the Tribunal concluded that TOCOFER Capsules should be classified under Heading 3003.10 as a medicament. The appeals were allowed accordingly, and the order was made in favor of the appellant.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates