9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2003 (4) TMI 30 - HC - Income TaxWhether Tribunal erred in holding that interest under section 234B and section 234C was not leviable in case income was subjected to tax under section 115J as it stood at the relevant time? - Merely because the curtain rises in the cases of companies falling under section 115J after March 31 is no ground for the assessee-company not to pay interest under section 234B and section 234C - it was found that the tax liability under section 115J was 26, 45, 004 against which the advance-tax paid was only 15 lakhs and consequently there was short payment of advance-tax Hence interest under section 234B and section 234C was leviable
Issues Involved:
1. Entitlement to higher depreciation on leased vehicles. 2. Levy of interest under sections 234B and 234C when tax liability arises under section 115J. Detailed Analysis: 1. Entitlement to Higher Depreciation on Leased Vehicles: Facts: The assessee, a leasing and financing company, claimed higher depreciation at 50% on trucks, buses, and motor vans leased out to its customers. The Tribunal disallowed this claim, stating that the assessee did not run the vehicles on hire nor did it carry on the business of running them on hire. Arguments: - Department's Position: The Tribunal correctly held that the word "lease" cannot be equated with "hire." The assessee's business was leasing and financing, not running vehicles on hire. Therefore, higher depreciation was not applicable. - Assessee's Position: The assessee argued that if the lessees used the vehicles in the business of running them on hire, higher depreciation should be allowed. This argument was based on the Supreme Court's judgment in CIT v. Shaan Finance (P.) Ltd. [1998] 231 ITR 308. Findings: The court noted that the Assessing Officer had already granted normal depreciation, and the genuineness of the transactions was not in question. The vehicles were owned by the assessee and leased out to customers, who might use them for running on hire. The Tribunal's decision to remand the matter back to the Assessing Officer to ascertain the lessees' use of the vehicles was upheld. The court affirmed that if the lessees used the vehicles for running on hire, higher depreciation should be allowed, thereby answering the question in favor of the assessee. 2. Levy of Interest Under Sections 234B and 234C When Tax Liability Arises Under Section 115J: Facts: The assessee paid advance tax based on its estimated income but faced a higher tax liability under section 115J, leading to a shortfall in advance tax payment. The Department levied interest under sections 234B and 234C for this shortfall. Arguments: - Department's Position: The Department argued that advance tax is payable on the "current income," which includes income computed under section 115J. The Tribunal erred in holding that interest under sections 234B and 234C was not leviable when income was assessed under section 115J. - Assessee's Position: The assessee contended that section 115J involves deemed income, which is determined after the financial year ends. Therefore, it was impractical to estimate this income for advance tax purposes. The assessee relied on the Karnataka High Court's judgment in Kwality Biscuits Ltd. v. CIT [2000] 243 ITR 519. Findings: The court found merit in the Department's arguments. It held that the words "current income" in section 207 include income under section 115J. The interest under sections 234B and 234C is compensatory, not penal, and applies to short payments of advance tax. The court disagreed with the Karnataka High Court's judgment and supported the views of the Gauhati and Madhya Pradesh High Courts, ruling that interest under sections 234B and 234C is applicable even when tax liability arises under section 115J. Thus, the question was answered in favor of the Department. Conclusion: The appeal was disposed of with the following conclusions: 1. The assessee is entitled to higher depreciation if the lessees use the vehicles for running them on hire. 2. Interest under sections 234B and 234C is chargeable even when tax liability arises under section 115J.
|
