Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2010 (4) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2010 (4) TMI 210 - HC - Income Tax


Issues Involved:

1. Whether the Tribunal erred in law in holding that credit for brought forward MAT is to be given from gross demand before charging interest u/s. 234B of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. Whether the Tribunal erred in law in holding that interest u/s. 244A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was allowable on the refundable taxes arrived after giving credit of brought forward MAT from the gross demand.

Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Credit for Brought Forward MAT Before Charging Interest u/s. 234B:

The core issue was whether MAT Credit should be considered before computing interest payable under Section 234B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Revenue contended that MAT credit should be given after computing the interest under Section 234B, while the assessee argued that MAT credit should be considered before charging interest.

The court examined the statutory provisions, particularly Sections 234A, 234B, 234C, 115J, 115JA, 115JAA, and 115JB. It was noted that Section 234B imposes interest for defaults in payment of advance tax, and the term "assessed tax" was defined in Explanation 1 to Section 234B. The court emphasized that the MAT credit available under Section 115JAA represents tax paid by the assessee and should be considered in computing the liability to pay interest under Section 234B.

The court concluded that the credit to which an assessee is entitled under Section 115JAA must be taken into account before computing interest under Section 234B. This interpretation aligns with the compensatory nature of interest under Section 234B, which aims to compensate the exchequer for being deprived of advance tax payment. The court held that ignoring MAT credit would result in unintended and absurd consequences.

The amendment to Explanation 1 to Section 234B by the Finance Act of 2006, effective from 1 April 2007, was deemed clarificatory and curative in nature. The amendment explicitly included MAT credit in the definition of "assessed tax," which the court interpreted as applicable retrospectively to resolve any ambiguity.

2. Interest u/s. 244A on Refundable Taxes After Giving MAT Credit:

The second issue was whether interest under Section 244A was allowable on refundable taxes after giving MAT credit. The court noted that the answer to this question was consequential to the determination of the first issue.

Given that the court held MAT credit must be considered before computing interest under Section 234B, it followed that the assessee was entitled to a refund of excess tax paid after adjusting for MAT credit, TDS, advance tax, and self-assessment tax. Therefore, interest under Section 244A was allowable on the refundable amount.

Conclusion:

The court answered both questions of law in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue. The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed, and the Tribunal's decision was upheld. The court emphasized that the amendment to Explanation 1 to Section 234B was clarificatory and retrospective, ensuring that MAT credit should be considered before computing interest under Section 234B. Consequently, interest under Section 244A was also allowable on the refundable taxes.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates