9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Whether imported components can be considered a complete calculator by virtue of Rule 2(a) of Interpretative Rules. 2. Whether all the components imported for an electronic calculator in a knocked down condition should be assessed as a complete calculator or as individual components under different headings of the Central Tariff. Issue 1: The appeal was against the order of CCE (Appeals) regarding the classification of imported components as a complete calculator under Rule 2(a) of Interpretative Rules. The circular no. 44/87 was referenced, stating that the components were not considered a complete calculator as they underwent further manufacturing processes like electronic cleaning, cutting, mounting on PCB, affixing connectors, testing, etc., making them semi-finished components. The tribunal agreed that the components did not meet the conditions of Rule 2(a) and should be classified under heading 84.73, setting aside the impugned order. Issue 2: After considering the arguments, it was established that all components imported for an electronic calculator in a knocked down condition were presented for assessment simultaneously. The tribunal noted that except for PVC wires and self-adhesive tapes, all ingredients of an electronic calculator were imported. Referring to the Supreme Court's decision in Sharp Business Machines and the Larger Bench decision in the case of Sony India Ltd., it was concluded that the imports should be assessed as an electronic calculator and not as individual components. The tribunal rejected the argument that subsequent processing after import completed the semi-finished components, upholding the lower authority's classification decision. Consequently, the Revenue's appeal was allowed, setting aside the CC (Appeals) order and confirming the Addl. Commissioner's order.
|
