9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Imposition of penalty for import of dredger. 2. Assessment of duty on PVC pipes supplied along with the dredger. Analysis: 1. The appellants contested the imposition of a penalty of Rs. 2 lakhs for importing a dredger in challenge to Order-in-Original (OIO) No. 7/2002. The dredger was imported for fulfilling a lease agreement and limited work, with the intention of re-exporting it within two years upon completing the work. The Commissioner noted that dredgers are freely importable under the Exim policy, but he relied on policy guidelines requiring approval from the Ministry of Surface Transport, which the appellants did not obtain. The Tribunal previously ruled in a similar case that PVC pipes are part of the dredger and cannot be separately assessed for duty. The Tribunal found that without specific guidelines or policies in place, the penalty imposition was unjustified. Consequently, the penalty of Rs. 2 lakhs was set aside. 2. The Commissioner confirmed the duty assessment on 300 meters of PVC pipes supplied with the dredger. However, the Tribunal, based on a previous case, determined that the PVC pipes were an indispensable part of the main mother-craft (dredger) and should not be separately classified for duty assessment. As a result, the confirmation of duty on the PVC pipes was set aside. The Tribunal allowed the appeal with any consequential relief. In conclusion, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside both the penalty imposed for importing the dredger and the duty assessment on the PVC pipes supplied with the dredger. The decision was based on the absence of specific guidelines requiring approval for import and the classification of PVC pipes as an integral part of the dredger, as established in a previous case.
|
