Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2003 (2) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2003 (2) TMI 22 - HC - Income Tax


Issues:
1. Assessment of interest income under the head 'Other sources'
2. Assessment of interest income under different heads
3. Inclusion of profit derived from processing in third-party factories for section 80HH benefit

Analysis:

Issue 1: Assessment of interest income under the head 'Other sources'
The appeal concerned the assessment of interest income received by an individual engaged in the export business of cashew kernels. The Assessing Officer had categorized the interest income from term deposits as income under the head "Other sources" instead of as part of the business profit. The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to reevaluate if the deposits were maintained for business purposes and to include interest as part of business profit if so. The High Court held, based on previous judgments, that interest income on short-term deposits should be assessed under the head "Other sources," not as business income. Therefore, the first two questions were answered against the assessee in favor of the Revenue.

Issue 2: Assessment of interest income under different heads
The tribunal's direction to assess interest income under different heads was addressed in the judgment, relying on previous decisions that established interest income on short-term deposits should be assessed under "Other sources." The High Court upheld this view and answered the questions related to this issue against the assessee in favor of the Revenue.

Issue 3: Inclusion of profit derived from processing in third-party factories for section 80HH benefit
Regarding the inclusion of profit derived from processing cashew kernels in third-party factories for section 80HH benefit, the High Court referred to a previous judgment stating that processing for export in third-party factories also qualifies for the benefit. As a result, the question related to this issue was answered in favor of the assessee against the Revenue. Since the answer to the first sub-question was affirmative, the second sub-question did not require consideration.

The High Court concluded that no further inquiry by the Assessing Officer was necessary, and the assessment needed modification based on the court's answers to the issues raised in the appeal. The judgment provided detailed reasons for the assessment of interest income under the head "Other sources" and annexed a copy of the relevant judgment for reference. Ultimately, the income-tax appeal was disposed of accordingly.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates