2005 (5) TMI 535 - AT - Customs

Summary

Issues: Appeal against suspension of CHA license at Vizag based on alleged offenses at other Custom Houses.

Analysis:
1. The appellant challenged the suspension of their CHA license at Vizag by the Commissioner of Customs, citing that the suspension was unjustified as the alleged offenses were committed at other Custom Houses. The appellant argued that the suspension order was against the law since there was no offense committed at Vizag Port. The appellant pointed out that the Commissioner of Customs at Chennai had suspended the license of a CHA for offenses at Chennai Port, which led to the suspension of the license at Vizag as well. The appellant relied on previous judgments where the Tribunal had set aside suspension orders issued at one place for offenses committed at another place by the CHA.

2. The Senior Departmental Representative (SDR) requested time to obtain a report on the matter but acknowledged that the previous judgments were applicable to the case. Despite this, the SDR sought further information before proceeding.

3. After considering the submissions, the Tribunal found that the appellant's operations at Custom House Vizag were suspended based on offenses allegedly committed at Chennai Custom House. The Tribunal noted that the appellant had separate licenses at various Custom Houses, and the grounds for suspension were related to activities at Chennai Custom House. Citing precedents, the Tribunal held that the suspension of the license at Vizag due to offenses at another location was not valid. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the suspension order issued by the Commissioner of Customs at Vizag with immediate effect, in line with the judgments referenced by the appellant. The Tribunal directed the Registry to expedite the issuance of the order.