9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
- Disallowance of claim made by the assessee under the 'Interest Free Sales-tax' deferral scheme (IFST Deferral Scheme) framed by the State Government of Tamilnadu for the assessment years 1995-96 & 1996-97. Analysis: 1. The assessee appealed against the disallowance of their claim under the IFST Deferral Scheme by the Commissioner (Appeals) for the assessment years 1995-96 & 1996-97. The Assessing Officer found that the claim exceeded the quantum mentioned in the relevant notification issued by the State Government of Tamilnadu. The department contended that the assessee must pay the sales tax in the previous year to avail the exemption, as per Circular No. 674. The assessee argued that the scheme's purpose was to defer payment for industrial growth without interest. The Tribunal found the assessee entitled to the exemption under section 43B despite not producing the eligibility certificate before the authorities. The case was restored to the Assessing Officer for proper analysis of the eligibility certificate and to allow the benefit without insisting on payment as per Circulars. The appeals were treated as allowed for statistical purposes. 2. The learned representative of the assessee presented eligibility certificates issued by the State Government of Tamilnadu, indicating deferral of sales tax interest-free for specific periods. The delay in obtaining these certificates led to non-production before authorities. The department insisted on strict adherence to Circular No. 674, requiring payment in the previous year for exemption. The assessee argued that such insistence would defeat the scheme's purpose of facilitating industrial activities without financial burden. The Tribunal held that technical adherence to the circular should not override the scheme's intended benefits and objectives. The case was remanded to the Assessing Officer for a thorough review of the eligibility certificates and to grant the benefit without mandatory payment as per Circulars. 3. The departmental representative relied on the strict interpretation of Circular No. 674, emphasizing the requirement of payment in the previous year for exemption. The assessee's representative highlighted conflicting judicial decisions and argued for a broader interpretation in line with the scheme's objectives. The Tribunal considered both arguments and concluded that the assessee should be allowed the benefit under section 43B despite the non-production of the eligibility certificate before the authorities. The case was referred back to the Assessing Officer for a detailed review and appropriate orders in accordance with the law and scheme's purpose. 4. The Tribunal's decision was based on the understanding that the department's insistence on payment in the previous year, as per Circulars, would nullify the intended benefits of the IFST Deferral Scheme. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering the scheme's objectives over technical interpretations of Circulars. By remanding the case to the Assessing Officer for a thorough analysis of the eligibility certificates, the Tribunal aimed to ensure the proper application of the scheme's benefits to the assessee without unnecessary financial burdens.
|
