9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Addition on account of disallowance out of interest expenditure claimed by the assessee. Analysis: The appeals by the revenue were against the order of CIT(A) for the assessment years 1991-92, 1992-93, and 1994-95, all involving the same issue. The primary contention was regarding the disallowance of interest expenditure claimed by the assessee. The assessee, an individual, had received loans from outside parties and advanced loans to sister concerns without charging interest from one of them. The Assessing Officer disallowed the interest on the uncharged amount, leading to the dispute. The Departmental Representative argued that the advance lacked a business purpose as no leasehold rights were acquired, emphasizing the absence of a finalized agreement or payment obligation. The counsel for the assessee countered by highlighting the property valuation and the nature of funds used for the advance, asserting that the interest disallowance was unwarranted. The subsequent rejoinder reiterated the need for the assessee to substantiate the business purpose behind the advance. Upon careful consideration, the tribunal found that the assessee failed to establish a business purpose for the advance, especially due to the absence of a finalized agreement or payment liability. While the balance sheet indicated a substantial non-interest bearing fund, the tribunal emphasized the need to trace the source of the interest-free advance. Consequently, the tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to disallow interest related to the interest-bearing loans, restricting the disallowance to specific amounts and providing a clear directive for further assessment. In conclusion, the Revenue's appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, with the tribunal's decision focusing on the lack of evidence supporting a business purpose for the interest-free advance and the subsequent interest disallowance based on the nature of funds utilized for the transaction.
|
