9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Cross appeals by revenue and assessee against CIT(A) order dated 14-11-2002 regarding expenditure incurred by assessee. Analysis: The only issue in the appeals relates to various expenditures disallowed by the Assessing Officer, totaling Rs. 11,85,500. The CIT(A) sustained the disallowance at 50%, leading to appeals before the Tribunal by both parties. The revenue argued that the CIT(A)'s order is not sustainable, as the assessee failed to provide sufficient evidence to justify the expenses. The revenue contended that the assessment order disallowing the expenses should be upheld. Conversely, the assessee's counsel argued that payments were made via cheques, and the Assessing Officer's concerns about high expenditure in certain months were due to the nature of contract work completion towards the end of the year. The assessee claimed that the entire amount should have been allowed. After hearing both sides, the Tribunal noted that strict monthly correlation of expenditure with receipts was impracticable, especially in cases where payments were made in advance and adjustments were made later. The Tribunal found the assessee's explanations reasonable and accepted the claim in full, deleting the addition sustained by the CIT(A). In the assessee's appeal, another ground related to disallowance under section 43B of the Act was raised. The Assessing Officer disallowed Rs. 4,21,918 for payments made beyond statutory time limits. However, a review of the payment details revealed that all amounts were paid within the relevant financial year, making them allowable deductions. Citing the precedent set by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of M/s. Allied Motors, the Tribunal deleted the addition made by the Assessing Officer. In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal and allowed the assessee's appeal, thereby ruling in favor of the assessee regarding the disputed expenditures and the disallowance under section 43B of the Act.
|
