2004 (7) TMI 605 - AT - Central Excise

Summary

Issues: Dismissal of appeal by Commissioner (Appeals) on the ground of non-pursuance

The judgment by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai dealt with the issue of the dismissal of an appeal by the Commissioner (Appeals) on the ground that it was not pursued. The appellant's counsel argued that the lower appellate authority passed an ex parte order dismissing the appeal as not pursued, which is not within the Commissioner's jurisdiction. The counsel cited precedents like the case of Lodha Fabrics v. CCE to support this argument. On the other hand, the JDR representing the respondent highlighted that despite several adjournments, the party did not appear to pursue their appeal. The Tribunal examined the submissions and referred to previous rulings, emphasizing that the Commissioner (Appeals) cannot dismiss an appeal solely for non-representation. The Tribunal cited cases like CCE, Mumbai - VI v. Raptakos Brett & Co. to support this position. Consequently, the Tribunal held the impugned order as not legal and proper, setting it aside and remanding the matter to the Commissioner (Appeals) to decide the issue on merits in accordance with the law, without expressing any opinion on the case's merits itself. The related order SO/246/04 was also disposed of accordingly.

---