Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2005 (12) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2005 (12) TMI 474 - AT - Central Excise

Issues:
1. Modvat credit denial based on first stage dealer's supplementary invoices.

Analysis:
The appeal was against the Order-in-Appeal granting Modvat credit to the Respondent based on invoices issued by the first stage dealer. The Respondent, a manufacturer, availed Modvat credit on these invoices, leading to a show cause notice denying them credit on the grounds that the first stage dealer's supplementary invoices were ineligible. The adjudicating authority upheld the demand and imposed a penalty, which was later reversed by the Commissioner (Appeals), allowing the credit. The Revenue appealed this decision.

Upon hearing both sides and examining the records, the Commissioner (Appeals) emphasized the importance of supplementary invoices in the process. It was noted that the duty paid through these invoices was on inputs initially supplied by the manufacturer and then to the dealer. The Commissioner found these invoices to be valid for Cenvat credit under Rule 7(a)(iv), as they were integral to the main invoice and contained necessary duty payment particulars.

Further analysis revealed that the invoices issued by the first stage dealer were covered under Rule 7 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002, specifically mentioning first stage dealers as eligible issuers. These invoices were based on additional duty paid by the manufacturer to the government. The court emphasized that denying credit on these grounds would be unjust, as the duty paid by the manufacturer should rightfully benefit the respondent as well. Ultimately, it was concluded that the order-in-appeal did not warrant interference, and the appeal was dismissed.

In summary, the judgment upheld the validity of Modvat credit based on invoices issued by the first stage dealer, emphasizing the interconnected nature of these invoices with the manufacturer's duty payments. The decision highlighted the importance of following the rules and ensuring that legitimate rights to credit are not denied based on technicalities like the term "supplementary invoices."

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates