9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Charging of interest u/s 234B and 234C in respect of income computed u/s 115JA of the Income-tax Act. Summary: Issue 1: Charging of Interest u/s 234B and 234C in respect of income computed u/s 115JA The assessee contested the charging of interest u/s 234B and 234C on income computed u/s 115JA. The Assessing Officer (A.O.) levied interest, citing the Gauhati High Court's decision in Assam Bengal Carriers Ltd. v. CIT, which held that interest under these sections is applicable even when provisions of section 115J are invoked. The CIT(A) upheld the A.O.'s decision. The assessee argued that sections 115J and 115JA are substantively the same, and the Supreme Court's decision in CIT v. Kwality Biscuits Ltd., which held that interest under sections 234B and 234C is not chargeable on income computed u/s 115J, should apply to section 115JA as well. The assessee also referenced the Kerala High Court's decision in CIT v. Appollo Tyres Ltd., which supported this view. The Tribunal examined the provisions of sections 234B and 234C, which pertain to the payment of advance tax and the consequences of failing to do so. It noted that section 115JA, like section 115J, involves computing book profits after the close of the financial year, making it impractical for the assessee to estimate advance tax liability accurately during the year. The Tribunal referred to the Karnataka High Court's decision in Kwality Biscuits Ltd. v. CIT, which held that interest under sections 234B and 234C could not be charged on income computed u/s 115J, as the liability could only be determined after the financial year ended. This decision was affirmed by the Supreme Court. The Tribunal acknowledged the contrary view of the Punjab & Haryana High Court in CIT v. Upper India Steel Mfg. & Engg. Co. Ltd., which held that advance tax provisions apply to income computed u/s 115JA. However, it emphasized that the Supreme Court's affirmation of the Karnataka High Court's decision in Kwality Biscuits Ltd. takes precedence. The Tribunal concluded that the rationale for non-charging of interest under sections 234B and 234C, as laid down by the Karnataka High Court and affirmed by the Supreme Court, applies equally to section 115JA. It held that the assessee cannot be penalized for failing to pay advance tax on income computed u/s 115JA, as the liability can only be ascertained after the financial year ends. In light of the principle established by the Supreme Court in CIT v. Vegetable Products Ltd., which favors the interpretation beneficial to the assessee when two reasonable constructions of a taxing provision are possible, the Tribunal decided in favor of the assessee. It reversed the lower authority's order and held that no interest u/s 234B and 234C is chargeable on income computed u/s 115JA. Conclusion: The appeal of the assessee is allowed.
|
